12-32582122-A-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001370298.3(FGD4):c.666A>T(p.Ala222Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00199 in 1,614,226 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0020 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

FGD4
NM_001370298.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.961

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

FGD4 (HGNC:19125): (FYVE, RhoGEF and PH domain containing 4) This gene encodes a protein that is involved in the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton and cell shape. This protein contains an actin filament-binding domain, which together with its Dbl homology domain and one of its pleckstrin homology domains, can form microspikes. This protein can activate MAPK8 independently of the actin filament-binding domain, and it is also involved in the activation of CDC42 via the exchange of bound GDP for free GTP. The activation of CDC42 also enables this protein to play a role in mediating the cellular invasion of Cryptosporidium parvum, an intracellular parasite that infects the gastrointestinal tract. Mutations in this gene can cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4H (CMT4H), a disorder of the peripheral nervous system. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2015]

FGD4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4H
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet

FGD4 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).

BP6

Variant 12-32582122-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-32582122-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 215968.We mark this variant Benign, oryginal submission is: [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.961 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0015 (228/152332) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00304 (207/68032). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0027. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 99 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FGD4	NM_001370298.3 link	c.666A>T	p.Ala222Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 17	ENST00000534526.7	NP_001357227.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FGD4	ENST00000534526.7 link	c.666A>T	p.Ala222Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 17	5	NM_001370298.3	ENSP00000449273.1		F8VWL3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00150

AC:

228

AN:

152214

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000386

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00304

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00130

AC:

327

AN:

251456

AF XY:

0.00135

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000431

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000318

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000298

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00260

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00147

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00204

AC:

2978

AN:

1461894

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00198

AC XY:

1442

AN XY:

727248

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000358

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000425

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000268

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000187

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00254

AC:

2828

AN:

1112012

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00167

AC:

101

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.485

Heterozygous variant carriers

204

408

613

817

1021

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00150

AC:

228

AN:

152332

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00133

AC XY:

AN XY:

74492

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000385

AC:

AN:

41574

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000196

AC:

AN:

15296

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000288

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4834

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10618

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00304

AC:

207

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.497

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.00195

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00142

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00202

EpiControl

AF:

0.00207

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Dec 14, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

FGD4: BP4, BP7 -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4H

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Nov 09, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:2

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 23, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Benign:1

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Jul 11, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4

Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.83

CADD

Benign

6.1

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.63

PhyloP100

0.96

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

12-32582122-A-T

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over