12-32624425-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001370298.3(FGD4):c.1926T>C(p.Ser642Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00288 in 1,601,258 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 99 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001370298.3 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Charcot-Marie-Tooth diseaseInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4HInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001370298.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGD4 | NM_001370298.3 | MANE Select | c.1926T>C | p.Ser642Ser | synonymous | Exon 12 of 17 | NP_001357227.2 | ||
| FGD4 | NM_001384126.1 | c.1926T>C | p.Ser642Ser | synonymous | Exon 12 of 18 | NP_001371055.1 | |||
| FGD4 | NM_001304481.2 | c.1770T>C | p.Ser590Ser | synonymous | Exon 12 of 17 | NP_001291410.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGD4 | ENST00000534526.7 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.1926T>C | p.Ser642Ser | synonymous | Exon 12 of 17 | ENSP00000449273.1 | ||
| FGD4 | ENST00000395740.5 | TSL:1 | n.*907T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 13 of 17 | ENSP00000379089.1 | |||
| FGD4 | ENST00000395740.5 | TSL:1 | n.*907T>C | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 13 of 17 | ENSP00000379089.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0150 AC: 2284AN: 152152Hom.: 50 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00383 AC: 948AN: 247666 AF XY: 0.00269 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00160 AC: 2322AN: 1448990Hom.: 48 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.00138 AC XY: 998AN XY: 721128 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0151 AC: 2293AN: 152268Hom.: 51 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0150 AC XY: 1115AN XY: 74452 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4H Benign:2
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.
not provided Benign:2
not specified Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
FGD4-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4 Benign:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at