12-42472403-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2

The NM_153026.3(PRICKLE1):​c.114G>A​(p.Pro38Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00376 in 1,614,046 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 31 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0029 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0039 ( 30 hom. )

Consequence

PRICKLE1
NM_153026.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.823
Variant links:
Genes affected
PRICKLE1 (HGNC:17019): (prickle planar cell polarity protein 1) This gene encodes a nuclear receptor that may be a negative regulator of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. The encoded protein localizes to the nuclear membrane and has been implicated in the nuclear trafficking of the transcription repressors REST/NRSF and REST4. Mutations in this gene have been linked to progressive myoclonus epilepsy. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants. A pseudogene of this gene is found on chromosome 3. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).
BP6
Variant 12-42472403-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-42472403-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 96505.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr12-42472403-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.823 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 30 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PRICKLE1NM_153026.3 linkc.114G>A p.Pro38Pro synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 8 ENST00000345127.9 NP_694571.2 Q96MT3A0A024R0W7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PRICKLE1ENST00000345127.9 linkc.114G>A p.Pro38Pro synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 8 1 NM_153026.3 ENSP00000345064.3 Q96MT3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00289
AC:
439
AN:
152112
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000604
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00151
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000208
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00424
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00495
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00249
AC:
624
AN:
251022
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.00243
AC XY:
330
AN XY:
135690
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000801
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000723
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00149
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000359
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00333
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00413
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00310
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00386
AC:
5636
AN:
1461816
Hom.:
30
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00375
AC XY:
2725
AN XY:
727212
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000627
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000626
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00187
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000243
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00350
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00460
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00343
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00288
AC:
439
AN:
152230
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00283
AC XY:
211
AN XY:
74428
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000602
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000208
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00424
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00495
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
Alfa
AF:
0.00436
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00232
EpiCase
AF:
0.00502
EpiControl
AF:
0.00391

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

PRICKLE1: BP4, BP7, BS2 -

Oct 09, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:4
Mar 19, 2013
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Sep 01, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 06, 2024
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 07, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Epilepsy, progressive myoclonic, 1B Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

PRICKLE1-related disorder Benign:1
Jul 06, 2020
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.60
CADD
Benign
0.14
DANN
Benign
0.52

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141743294; hg19: chr12-42866205; COSMIC: COSV61542010; COSMIC: COSV61542010; API