12-4370563-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 16 ACMG points: 16P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3PP5_Very_Strong
The NM_020638.3(FGF23):c.536G>A(p.Arg179Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R179W) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020638.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic ricketsInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- tumoral calcinosis, hyperphosphatemic, familial, 2Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
- tumoral calcinosis, hyperphosphatemic, familial, 1Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 16 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_020638.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGF23 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.536G>A | p.Arg179Gln | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000237837.1 | Q9GZV9 | ||
| ENSG00000285901 | n.*1204+4281C>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000501898.1 | A0A6Q8PFP0 | ||||
| ENSG00000285901 | n.*1967+4281C>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000497536.1 | A0A3B3IT44 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000401 AC: 1AN: 249544 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at