12-51104169-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_005653.5(TFCP2):c.952C>A(p.Pro318Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000929 in 1,613,954 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P318A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005653.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFCP2 | NM_005653.5 | c.952C>A | p.Pro318Thr | missense_variant | Exon 9 of 15 | ENST00000257915.10 | NP_005644.2 | |
TFCP2 | NM_001173452.2 | c.952C>A | p.Pro318Thr | missense_variant | Exon 9 of 15 | NP_001166923.1 | ||
TFCP2 | NM_001173453.2 | c.799C>A | p.Pro267Thr | missense_variant | Exon 8 of 14 | NP_001166924.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000796 AC: 2AN: 251252 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000958 AC: 14AN: 1461810Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 727206 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74324 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at