12-51688810-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 12 ACMG points: 12P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3_StrongPP5
The ENST00000354534.11(SCN8A):c.667A>G(p.Arg223Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R223Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000354534.11 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN8A | NM_014191.4 | c.667A>G | p.Arg223Gly | missense_variant | 6/27 | ENST00000354534.11 | NP_055006.1 | |
SCN8A | NM_001330260.2 | c.615-195A>G | intron_variant | ENST00000627620.5 | NP_001317189.1 | |||
SCN8A | NM_001177984.3 | c.667A>G | p.Arg223Gly | missense_variant | 6/26 | NP_001171455.1 | ||
SCN8A | NM_001369788.1 | c.615-195A>G | intron_variant | NP_001356717.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN8A | ENST00000354534.11 | c.667A>G | p.Arg223Gly | missense_variant | 6/27 | 1 | NM_014191.4 | ENSP00000346534 | P4 | |
SCN8A | ENST00000627620.5 | c.615-195A>G | intron_variant | 5 | NM_001330260.2 | ENSP00000487583 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, 13 Pathogenic:1Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | GeneReviews | - | - - |
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Nov 01, 2014 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at