12-54397390-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_002205.5(ITGA5):c.3041G>C(p.Gly1014Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000105 in 1,613,896 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G1014S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002205.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002205.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITGA5 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.3041G>C | p.Gly1014Ala | missense | Exon 29 of 30 | ENSP00000293379.4 | P08648 | ||
| ITGA5 | c.3095G>C | p.Gly1032Ala | missense | Exon 29 of 30 | ENSP00000615376.1 | ||||
| ITGA5 | c.3068G>C | p.Gly1023Ala | missense | Exon 29 of 30 | ENSP00000615377.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152070Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000795 AC: 2AN: 251458 AF XY: 0.0000147 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000103 AC: 15AN: 1461826Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000165 AC XY: 12AN XY: 727220 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152070Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74264 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at