12-54961249-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_001136030.3(TESPA1):c.1486G>A(p.Glu496Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.114 in 1,613,776 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 25,585 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E496G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001136030.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TESPA1 | NM_001136030.3 | c.1486G>A | p.Glu496Lys | missense_variant | Exon 10 of 11 | ENST00000449076.6 | NP_001129502.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TESPA1 | ENST00000449076.6 | c.1486G>A | p.Glu496Lys | missense_variant | Exon 10 of 11 | 2 | NM_001136030.3 | ENSP00000400892.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.113 AC: 17236AN: 152018Hom.: 2280 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.194 AC: 48412AN: 249554 AF XY: 0.203 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.114 AC: 167058AN: 1461640Hom.: 23299 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.125 AC XY: 90684AN XY: 727098 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.113 AC: 17245AN: 152136Hom.: 2286 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.125 AC XY: 9279AN XY: 74366 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at