12-57749222-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP6BS2
The NM_000075.4(CDK4):c.779T>A(p.Val260Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000131 in 1,613,828 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V260L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000075.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDK4 | NM_000075.4 | c.779T>A | p.Val260Glu | missense_variant | 7/8 | ENST00000257904.11 | |
TSPAN31 | NM_005981.5 | c.*1932A>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 6/6 | ENST00000257910.8 | ||
TSPAN31 | NM_001330168.2 | c.*1932A>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 4/4 | |||
TSPAN31 | NM_001330169.2 | c.*1932A>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 6/6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDK4 | ENST00000257904.11 | c.779T>A | p.Val260Glu | missense_variant | 7/8 | 1 | NM_000075.4 | P1 | |
TSPAN31 | ENST00000257910.8 | c.*1932A>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 6/6 | 1 | NM_005981.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000125 AC: 19AN: 152136Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000599 AC: 15AN: 250476Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000442 AC XY: 6AN XY: 135746
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000132 AC: 193AN: 1461692Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000117 AC XY: 85AN XY: 727152
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000125 AC: 19AN: 152136Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000108 AC XY: 8AN XY: 74306
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 3 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | Sep 08, 2023 | The CDK4 c.779T>A (p.Val260Glu) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.012% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. This variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer (PMID: 25186627) and Lynch syndrome (PMID: 25980754). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with familial melanoma. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 31, 2018 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 04, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 30, 2023 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; In silico analysis supports a deleterious effect on splicing; Observed in individuals with breast cancer, thyroid cancer, or history concerning for Lynch Syndrome (Yurgelun et al., 2015; Bhai et al., 2021); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23718828, 26252490, 25980754, 34326862) - |
Familial melanoma Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | Nov 11, 2021 | The CDK4 c c.779T>A (p.Val260Glu) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.012% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-58143005-A-T?dataset=gnomad_r2_1). Five of seven in silico tools predict a benign effect of this variant on protein function (BP4), but to our knowledge these predictions have not been confirmed by functional studies. This variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer (PMID: 25186627) and Lynch syndrome (PMID: 25980754). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with familial melanoma. In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as of uncertain significance based on the ACMG/AMP criteria: BP4. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 21, 2024 | This sequence change replaces valine, which is neutral and non-polar, with glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 260 of the CDK4 protein (p.Val260Glu). This variant is present in population databases (rs200215596, gnomAD 0.01%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with clinical features of Lynch syndrome (PMID: 25980754, 34326862). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 182405). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt CDK4 protein function with a negative predictive value of 95%. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may create or strengthen a splice site. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | May 02, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 29, 2024 | Variant summary: CDK4 c.779T>A (p.Val260Glu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the protein kinase domain (IPR000719) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00013 in 1613828 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00017 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote (gnomAD v4.1.0). The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 8.5 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDK4 causing Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma phenotype (2e-05). c.779T>A has been reported in the literature in individuals undergoing hereditary cancer testing, individuals with breast cancer or head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (examples: Tung_Cancer_2015, Bhai_FG_2021, Lechner_GM_2013) without strong evidence for or against pathogenicity. These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 25186627, 34326862, 23718828). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 182405). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 06, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at