12-6453644-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_018009.5(TAPBPL):c.493A>G(p.Thr165Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.698 in 1,613,272 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 395,533 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T165I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018009.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAPBPL | NM_018009.5 | c.493A>G | p.Thr165Ala | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 7 | ENST00000266556.8 | NP_060479.3 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAPBPL | ENST00000266556.8 | c.493A>G | p.Thr165Ala | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 7 | 1 | NM_018009.5 | ENSP00000266556.7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.666 AC: 101216AN: 151954Hom.: 34029 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.682 AC: 170695AN: 250440 AF XY: 0.688 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.702 AC: 1025482AN: 1461200Hom.: 361479 Cov.: 67 AF XY: 0.703 AC XY: 511166AN XY: 726890 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.666 AC: 101289AN: 152072Hom.: 34054 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.667 AC XY: 49577AN XY: 74338 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at