12-76347019-A-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_024685.4(BBS10):āc.966T>Cā(p.Tyr322Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00101 in 1,612,722 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 19 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0051 ( 7 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.00058 ( 12 hom. )
Consequence
BBS10
NM_024685.4 synonymous
NM_024685.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.12
Genes affected
BBS10 (HGNC:26291): (Bardet-Biedl syndrome 10) This gene is a member of the Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) gene family. Bardet-Biedl syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by progressive retinal degeneration, obesity, polydactyly, renal malformation and cognitive disability. The proteins encoded by BBS gene family members are structurally diverse and the similar phenotypes exhibited by mutations in BBS gene family members is likely due to their shared roles in cilia formation and function. Many BBS proteins localize to the basal bodies, ciliary axonemes, and pericentriolar regions of cells. BBS proteins may also be involved in intracellular trafficking via microtubule-related transport. The protein encoded by this gene is likely not a ciliary protein but rather has distant sequence homology to type II chaperonins. As a molecular chaperone, this protein may affect the folding or stability of other ciliary or basal body proteins. Inhibition of this protein's expression impairs ciliogenesis in preadipocytes. Mutations in this gene cause Bardet-Biedl syndrome type 10. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.66).
BP6
Variant 12-76347019-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-76347019-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 261758.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-76347019-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=3.12 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0051 (777/152342) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.018 (748/41576). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0169. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 388 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 7 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBS10 | NM_024685.4 | c.966T>C | p.Tyr322Tyr | synonymous_variant | 2/2 | ENST00000650064.2 | NP_078961.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBS10 | ENST00000650064.2 | c.966T>C | p.Tyr322Tyr | synonymous_variant | 2/2 | NM_024685.4 | ENSP00000497413.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00508 AC: 774AN: 152224Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
774
AN:
152224
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00129 AC: 323AN: 250134Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000997 AC XY: 135AN XY: 135376
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
323
AN:
250134
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
135
AN XY:
135376
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000581 AC: 848AN: 1460380Hom.: 12 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000506 AC XY: 368AN XY: 726594
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
848
AN:
1460380
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
368
AN XY:
726594
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00510 AC: 777AN: 152342Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00521 AC XY: 388AN XY: 74498
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
777
AN:
152342
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
388
AN XY:
74498
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 19, 2018 | Variant summary: BBS10 c.966T>C alters a conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0016 in 275878 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.018 within the African subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within African control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 13.5 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BBS10 causing Bardet-Biedl Syndrome phenotype (0.0013), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.966T>C in individuals affected with Bardet-Biedl Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | May 18, 2017 | - - |
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 10 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Bardet-Biedl syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at