Menu
GeneBe

12-7690063-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM1PM2

The NM_020634.3(GDF3):c.910T>C(p.Ser304Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000342 in 1,461,884 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000034 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

GDF3
NM_020634.3 missense

Scores

6
13

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.743
Variant links:
Genes affected
GDF3 (HGNC:4218): (growth differentiation factor 3) This gene encodes a secreted ligand of the TGF-beta (transforming growth factor-beta) superfamily of proteins. Ligands of this family bind various TGF-beta receptors leading to recruitment and activation of SMAD family transcription factors that regulate gene expression. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate each subunit of the disulfide-linked homodimer. This protein plays a role ocular and skeletal development. Mutations in this gene are associated with microphthalmia, coloboma, and skeletal abnormalities in human patients. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points.

PM1
In a disulfide_bond (size 65) in uniprot entity GDF3_HUMAN there are 4 pathogenic changes around while only 1 benign (80%) in NM_020634.3
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
GDF3NM_020634.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.910T>C p.Ser304Pro missense_variant 2/2 ENST00000329913.4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
GDF3ENST00000329913.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.910T>C p.Ser304Pro missense_variant 2/21 NM_020634.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00000795
AC:
2
AN:
251470
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00000736
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
135912
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000342
AC:
5
AN:
1461884
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00000275
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
727240
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000497
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Bravo
AF:
0.00000756
ExAC
AF:
0.00000824
AC:
1

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Klippel-Feil syndrome 3, autosomal dominant Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeMar 26, 2019In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Possibly Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with GDF3-related conditions. This variant is present in population databases (rs774437736, ExAC 0.01%). This sequence change replaces serine with proline at codon 304 of the GDF3 protein (p.Ser304Pro). The serine residue is moderately conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between serine and proline. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.16
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.017
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.080
Cadd
Benign
18
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.67
D
Eigen
Benign
-0.25
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.21
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.18
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.71
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.012
T
MetaRNN
Uncertain
0.52
D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.13
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.1
L
MutationTaster
Benign
0.55
N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.40
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.7
N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.59
Sift
Benign
0.28
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.30
T
Polyphen
0.098
B
Vest4
0.32
MutPred
0.57
Loss of catalytic residue at S304 (P = 0.0036);
MVP
0.87
MPC
0.50
ClinPred
0.66
D
GERP RS
3.4
Varity_R
0.39
gMVP
0.86

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs774437736; hg19: chr12-7842659; API