12-80673072-A-G
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001145026.2(PTPRQ):c.6603-97A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.351 in 1,450,004 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 92,823 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.41 ( 13742 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.34 ( 79081 hom. )
Consequence
PTPRQ
NM_001145026.2 intron
NM_001145026.2 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -2.31
Publications
8 publications found
Genes affected
PTPRQ (HGNC:9679): (protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type Q) This locus encodes a member of the type III receptor-like protein-tyrosine phosphatase family. The encoded protein catalyzes the dephosphorylation of phosphotyrosine and phosphatidylinositol and plays roles in cellular proliferation and differentiation. Mutations at this locus have been linked to autosomal recessive deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2014]
PTPRQ Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 84AInheritance: AR, SD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- hearing loss, autosomal dominant 73Inheritance: AD, Unknown Classification: MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
BP6
Variant 12-80673072-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-80673072-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 1271771.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.598 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTPRQ | ENST00000644991.3 | c.6603-97A>G | intron_variant | Intron 42 of 44 | NM_001145026.2 | ENSP00000495607.1 | ||||
| PTPRQ | ENST00000616559.4 | c.6702-97A>G | intron_variant | Intron 42 of 44 | 5 | ENSP00000483259.1 | ||||
| ENSG00000304204 | ENST00000801015.1 | n.100+34037T>C | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 2 | ||||||
| ENSG00000304204 | ENST00000801016.1 | n.101-20721T>C | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.406 AC: 61628AN: 151866Hom.: 13716 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
61628
AN:
151866
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.345 AC: 447472AN: 1298020Hom.: 79081 AF XY: 0.342 AC XY: 216816AN XY: 634658 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
447472
AN:
1298020
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
216816
AN XY:
634658
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
17021
AN:
27434
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
6695
AN:
21984
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
7249
AN:
21346
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
8874
AN:
33072
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
17265
AN:
63574
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
15847
AN:
45190
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
1221
AN:
3664
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
354988
AN:
1028500
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
18312
AN:
53256
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.507
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
14040
28080
42121
56161
70201
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
11968
23936
35904
47872
59840
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.406 AC: 61699AN: 151984Hom.: 13742 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.402 AC XY: 29835AN XY: 74292 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
61699
AN:
151984
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
29835
AN XY:
74292
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
25038
AN:
41428
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
5125
AN:
15268
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
1162
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
1274
AN:
5154
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
1285
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
3621
AN:
10578
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
87
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
23195
AN:
67946
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
763
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1776
3552
5327
7103
8879
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
574
1148
1722
2296
2870
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
886
AN:
3474
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided
- -
Jul 23, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.