12-88049033-A-G

Variant names:

• chr12-88049033-A-G
• rs2033206514
• ENST00000550333.5:n.*1354A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong

The NM_025114.4(CEP290):​c.*151T>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000182 in 440,602 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.000024 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: CEP290 NM_025114.4 3_prime_UTR
• Clinical Significance: Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:5
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.163
• Publications: 0 publications found

Genes affected

RLIG1 (HGNC:25322): (RNA 5'-phosphate and 3'-OH ligase 1) Predicted to act upstream of or within hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiation. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

CEP290 (HGNC:29021): (centrosomal protein 290) This gene encodes a protein with 13 putative coiled-coil domains, a region with homology to SMC chromosome segregation ATPases, six KID motifs, three tropomyosin homology domains and an ATP/GTP binding site motif A. The protein is localized to the centrosome and cilia and has sites for N-glycosylation, tyrosine sulfation, phosphorylation, N-myristoylation, and amidation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Joubert syndrome and nephronophthisis and the presence of antibodies against this protein is associated with several forms of cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CEP290 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

• CEP290-related ciliopathy

  Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
• Joubert syndrome 5

  Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
• Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14

  Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
• Leber congenital amaurosis 10

  Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
• Leber congenital amaurosis

  Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
• Bardet-Biedl syndrome

  Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
• Joubert syndrome with oculorenal defect

  Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
• Meckel syndrome

  Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
• Senior-Loken syndrome

  Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

ACMG classification

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CEP290	NM_025114.4	c.*151T>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 54 of 54	ENST00000552810.6	NP_079390.3
RLIG1	NM_001009894.3	c.*611A>G		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 7 of 7	ENST00000356891.4	NP_001009894.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CEP290	ENST00000552810.6	c.*151T>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 54 of 54	1	NM_025114.4	ENSP00000448012.1
RLIG1	ENST00000356891.4	c.*611A>G		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 7 of 7	1	NM_001009894.3	ENSP00000349358.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1 AN: 151988 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.000288

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000243 AC: 7 AN: 288614 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 5 AF XY: 0.0000270 AC XY: 4 AN XY: 147932

African (AFR) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 7300

American (AMR) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 8668

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ) AF: 0.000737 AC: 7 AN: 9494

East Asian (EAS) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 22976

South Asian (SAS) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 7132

European-Finnish (FIN) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 32472

Middle Eastern (MID) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 1372

European-Non Finnish (NFE) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 181360

Other (OTH) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 17840

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1 AN: 151988 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0 AN XY: 74222

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.

African (AFR) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 41422

American (AMR) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 15242

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ) AF: 0.000288 AC: 1 AN: 3470

East Asian (EAS) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 5198

South Asian (SAS) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 4834

European-Finnish (FIN) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 10610

Middle Eastern (MID) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 314

European-Non Finnish (NFE) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 67898

Other (OTH) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 2088

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0.000000), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.

Alfa AF: 0.00 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.0000151

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

Submissions by phenotype

Senior-Loken syndrome 6 Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Leber congenital amaurosis 10 Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14 Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Meckel syndrome, type 4 Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Joubert syndrome 5 Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.77
CADD	Benign	8.2
DANN	Benign	0.81
PhyloP100		0.16
Mutation Taster		=100/0	polymorphism

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2033206514; hg19: chr12-88442810;