12-88071307-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_025114.4(CEP290):āc.5998A>Gā(p.Ile2000Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000121 in 1,604,948 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_025114.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEP290 | NM_025114.4 | c.5998A>G | p.Ile2000Val | missense_variant | 43/54 | ENST00000552810.6 | NP_079390.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEP290 | ENST00000552810.6 | c.5998A>G | p.Ile2000Val | missense_variant | 43/54 | 1 | NM_025114.4 | ENSP00000448012.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000145 AC: 22AN: 152172Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000149 AC: 36AN: 241972Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000122 AC XY: 16AN XY: 131034
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000118 AC: 172AN: 1452658Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.000122 AC XY: 88AN XY: 722516
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000144 AC: 22AN: 152290Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000107 AC XY: 8AN XY: 74462
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 29, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The CEP290 p.Ile2000Val variant was not identified in the literature but was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs183071230), ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Illumina, EGL Genetic Diagnostics, and Fulgent Genetics), and LOVD 3.0 (variant effect not shared). The variant was identified in control databases in 47 of 273358 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0001719 (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (non-Finnish) in 44 of 125324 chromosomes (freq: 0.000351), South Asian in 2 of 28942 chromosomes (freq: 0.000069) and Latino in 1 of 34100 chromosomes (freq: 0.000029), but was not observed in the African, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), or Other populations. The p.Ile2000 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms however four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 08, 2015 | - - |
Senior-Loken syndrome 6 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
CEP290-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Dec 20, 2023 | The CEP290 c.5998A>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Ile2000Val. This variant was reported in an individual with nephronophthisis-associated ciliopathies and in an individual with sperm motility disorders; however, no additional studies were performed to help assess the pathogenicity of this variant (Table S5, Halbritter et al. 2012. PubMed ID: 23188109; Oud et al. 2021. PubMed ID: 34089056). This variant is reported in 0.035% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD, which may be too common to be a primary cause of disease. Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
Leber congenital amaurosis 10 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Leber congenital amaurosis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Apr 17, 2020 | - - |
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis;C0687120:Nephronophthisis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 16, 2022 | This sequence change replaces isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 2000 of the CEP290 protein (p.Ile2000Val). This variant is present in population databases (rs183071230, gnomAD 0.03%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with CEP290-related disease (Invitae). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 281249). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt CEP290 protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Meckel syndrome, type 4 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Retinal dystrophy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, Univ. Regensburg, Univ. Regensburg | Jan 01, 2022 | - - |
Senior-Loken syndrome 6;C1857780:Joubert syndrome 5;C1857821:Leber congenital amaurosis 10;C1970161:Meckel syndrome, type 4;C2673874:Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Feb 02, 2022 | - - |
Joubert syndrome 5 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | DBGen Ocular Genomics | Jun 01, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at