12-89421232-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP3
The NM_172240.3(POC1B):c.1358T>C(p.Leu453Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000207 in 1,448,352 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L453Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_172240.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cone-rod dystrophy 20Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- ciliopathyInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- cone-rod dystrophyInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_172240.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POC1B | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1358T>C | p.Leu453Pro | missense | Exon 12 of 12 | ENSP00000323302.3 | Q8TC44-1 | ||
| POC1B | TSL:1 | c.968T>C | p.Leu323Pro | missense | Exon 10 of 10 | ENSP00000376877.4 | Q8IU52 | ||
| POC1B | TSL:1 | n.4326T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 2 of 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000207 AC: 3AN: 1448352Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000139 AC XY: 1AN XY: 718496 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at