12-93850053-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points: 5P and 0B. PM2PP3_ModeratePP5
The NM_003805.5(CRADD):c.382G>C(p.Gly128Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000105 in 1,612,004 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003805.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- syndromic intellectual disabilityInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- intellectual disability, autosomal recessive 34Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- autosomal recessive non-syndromic intellectual disabilityInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRADD | NM_003805.5 | c.382G>C | p.Gly128Arg | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 3 | ENST00000332896.8 | NP_003796.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRADD | ENST00000332896.8 | c.382G>C | p.Gly128Arg | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 3 | 1 | NM_003805.5 | ENSP00000327647.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000796 AC: 2AN: 251410 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000685 AC: 10AN: 1459826Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 726350 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000538 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74346 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Intellectual disability, autosomal recessive 34 Pathogenic:2Uncertain:1
Variant summary: CRADD c.382G>C (p.Gly128Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Death domain (IPR000488) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8e-06 in 251410 control chromosomes. c.382G>C has been reported in the literature in multiple homozygous individuals affected with non-syndromic intellectual disability (e.g. Puffenberger_2012) including thin lissencephaly (e.g. DiDonato_2016). These data indicate that the variant is very likely to be associated with disease. One publication reports experimental evidence showing the variant failed to activate caspase-2-initiated apoptosis required for neuronal pruning, compared to WT in vitro, however, additional evidence is necessary to make any conclusions about its effect on disease course (e.g. DiDonato_2016). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 27773430, 22279524). Two submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. One submitter classified the variant as pathogenic, and one submitter classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as pathogenic.
not provided Pathogenic:1
Published functional studies demonstrate the variant results in reduced CRADD protein expression (Di Donato et al., 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30281648, 27773430, 22279524, 31028937, 28726809, Belarde2021[thesis])
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at