13-102862589-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000123.4(ERCC5):​c.1440C>T​(p.His480His) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0063 in 1,614,028 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 516 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.032 ( 261 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0037 ( 255 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC5
NM_000123.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.05
Variant links:
Genes affected
ERCC5 (HGNC:3437): (ERCC excision repair 5, endonuclease) This gene encodes a single-strand specific DNA endonuclease that makes the 3' incision in DNA excision repair following UV-induced damage. The protein may also function in other cellular processes, including RNA polymerase II transcription, and transcription-coupled DNA repair. Mutations in this gene cause xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group G (XP-G), which is also referred to as xeroderma pigmentosum VII (XP7), a skin disorder characterized by hypersensitivity to UV light and increased susceptibility for skin cancer development following UV exposure. Some patients also develop Cockayne syndrome, which is characterized by severe growth defects, cognitive disability, and cachexia. Read-through transcription exists between this gene and the neighboring upstream BIVM (basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]
BIVM-ERCC5 (HGNC:43690): (BIVM-ERCC5 readthrough) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring BIVM (basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing) and ERCC5 (excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 5) genes on chromosome 13. The read-through transcript encodes a fusion protein that shares sequence identity with the products of each individual gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BP6
Variant 13-102862589-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-102862589-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 255159.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr13-102862589-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.05 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.107 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ERCC5NM_000123.4 linkc.1440C>T p.His480His synonymous_variant Exon 8 of 15 ENST00000652225.2 NP_000114.3 P28715-1
BIVM-ERCC5NM_001204425.2 linkc.2802C>T p.His934His synonymous_variant Exon 16 of 23 NP_001191354.2 R4GMW8Q59FZ7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ERCC5ENST00000652225.2 linkc.1440C>T p.His480His synonymous_variant Exon 8 of 15 NM_000123.4 ENSP00000498881.2 P28715-1
BIVM-ERCC5ENST00000639435.1 linkc.2802C>T p.His934His synonymous_variant Exon 18 of 25 5 ENSP00000491742.1 R4GMW8
BIVM-ERCC5ENST00000639132.1 linkc.2115C>T p.His705His synonymous_variant Exon 17 of 24 5 ENSP00000492684.1 A0A1W2PS85

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0316
AC:
4808
AN:
152026
Hom.:
261
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.109
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00988
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000456
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0235
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00867
AC:
2175
AN:
250982
AF XY:
0.00629
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.112
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00486
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000379
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00507
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00366
AC:
5353
AN:
1461884
Hom.:
255
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00325
AC XY:
2365
AN XY:
727240
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.117
AC:
3925
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00593
AC:
265
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0117
AC:
306
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000325
AC:
28
AN:
86252
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00555
AC:
32
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000236
AC:
262
AN:
1112012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00886
AC:
535
AN:
60396
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
371
741
1112
1482
1853
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
126
252
378
504
630
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0317
AC:
4816
AN:
152144
Hom.:
261
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0302
AC XY:
2246
AN XY:
74378
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.109
AC:
4535
AN:
41484
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00987
AC:
151
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0141
AC:
49
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000208
AC:
1
AN:
4814
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10592
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000456
AC:
31
AN:
67998
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0233
AC:
49
AN:
2106
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
207
413
620
826
1033
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
52
104
156
208
260
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0130
Hom.:
88
Bravo
AF:
0.0359
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00375
AC:
13
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000818
EpiControl
AF:
0.000771

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Xeroderma pigmentosum, group G Benign:4
Jul 11, 2016
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:3
Jan 01, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 10, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified Benign:1
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
CADD
Benign
0.35
DANN
Benign
0.35
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4150316; hg19: chr13-103514939; COSMIC: COSV104673129; API