13-102862589-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000123.4(ERCC5):c.1440C>T(p.His480His) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0063 in 1,614,028 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 516 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.032 ( 261 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0037 ( 255 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC5
NM_000123.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.05

Variant links:

Genes affected

ERCC5 (HGNC:3437): (ERCC excision repair 5, endonuclease) This gene encodes a single-strand specific DNA endonuclease that makes the 3' incision in DNA excision repair following UV-induced damage. The protein may also function in other cellular processes, including RNA polymerase II transcription, and transcription-coupled DNA repair. Mutations in this gene cause xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group G (XP-G), which is also referred to as xeroderma pigmentosum VII (XP7), a skin disorder characterized by hypersensitivity to UV light and increased susceptibility for skin cancer development following UV exposure. Some patients also develop Cockayne syndrome, which is characterized by severe growth defects, cognitive disability, and cachexia. Read-through transcription exists between this gene and the neighboring upstream BIVM (basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

ERCC5 links:

BIVM-ERCC5 (HGNC:43690): (BIVM-ERCC5 readthrough) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring BIVM (basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing) and ERCC5 (excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 5) genes on chromosome 13. The read-through transcript encodes a fusion protein that shares sequence identity with the products of each individual gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

BIVM-ERCC5 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).

BP6

Variant 13-102862589-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-102862589-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 255159.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr13-102862589-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.05 with no splicing effect.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.107 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ERCC5	NM_000123.4 link	c.1440C>T	p.His480His	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 15	ENST00000652225.2	NP_000114.3	P28715-1
BIVM-ERCC5	NM_001204425.2 link	c.2802C>T	p.His934His	synonymous_variant	Exon 16 of 23		NP_001191354.2	R4GMW8Q59FZ7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ERCC5	ENST00000652225.2 link	c.1440C>T	p.His480His	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 15		NM_000123.4	ENSP00000498881.2	P28715-1
BIVM-ERCC5	ENST00000639435.1 link	c.2802C>T	p.His934His	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 25	5		ENSP00000491742.1	R4GMW8
BIVM-ERCC5	ENST00000639132.1 link	c.2115C>T	p.His705His	synonymous_variant	Exon 17 of 24	5		ENSP00000492684.1	A0A1W2PS85

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0316

AC:

4808

AN:

152026

Hom.:

261

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.109

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00988

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.0141

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000415

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000456

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0235

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00867

AC:

2175

AN:

250982

Hom.:

118

AF XY:

0.00629

AC XY:

853

AN XY:

135644

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.112

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00486

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0108

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000379

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00507

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00366

AC:

5353

AN:

1461884

Hom.:

255

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00325

AC XY:

2365

AN XY:

727240

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.117

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00593

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0117

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000325

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000236

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00886

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0317

AC:

4816

AN:

152144

Hom.:

261

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0302

AC XY:

2246

AN XY:

74378

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.109

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00987

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.0141

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000208

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000456

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.0233

Alfa

AF:

0.0134

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0359

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00375

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000818

EpiControl

AF:

0.000771

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Xeroderma pigmentosum, group G

Benign:4

Jul 11, 2016

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 21, 2015

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Jun 10, 2019

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Jan 01, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.81

CADD

Benign

0.35

DANN

Benign

0.35

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over