13-102862735-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000123.4(ERCC5):āc.1586G>Cā(p.Cys529Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0401 in 1,614,202 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,412 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000123.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERCC5 | NM_000123.4 | c.1586G>C | p.Cys529Ser | missense_variant | 8/15 | ENST00000652225.2 | NP_000114.3 | |
BIVM-ERCC5 | NM_001204425.2 | c.2948G>C | p.Cys983Ser | missense_variant | 16/23 | NP_001191354.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERCC5 | ENST00000652225.2 | c.1586G>C | p.Cys529Ser | missense_variant | 8/15 | NM_000123.4 | ENSP00000498881 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0437 AC: 6648AN: 152204Hom.: 162 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0426 AC: 10707AN: 251362Hom.: 267 AF XY: 0.0434 AC XY: 5895AN XY: 135854
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0398 AC: 58133AN: 1461880Hom.: 1251 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0401 AC XY: 29180AN XY: 727240
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0437 AC: 6656AN: 152322Hom.: 161 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0444 AC XY: 3307AN XY: 74484
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 11, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 24, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | - - |
Xeroderma pigmentosum, group G Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Sep 21, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | Jan 22, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:2Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at