13-102862938-G-C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_000123.4(ERCC5):c.1789G>C(p.Val597Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00203 in 1,614,238 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0021 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC5
NM_000123.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:7O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.94

Variant links:

Genes affected

ERCC5 (HGNC:3437): (ERCC excision repair 5, endonuclease) This gene encodes a single-strand specific DNA endonuclease that makes the 3' incision in DNA excision repair following UV-induced damage. The protein may also function in other cellular processes, including RNA polymerase II transcription, and transcription-coupled DNA repair. Mutations in this gene cause xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group G (XP-G), which is also referred to as xeroderma pigmentosum VII (XP7), a skin disorder characterized by hypersensitivity to UV light and increased susceptibility for skin cancer development following UV exposure. Some patients also develop Cockayne syndrome, which is characterized by severe growth defects, cognitive disability, and cachexia. Read-through transcription exists between this gene and the neighboring upstream BIVM (basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

ERCC5 links:

BIVM-ERCC5 (HGNC:43690): (BIVM-ERCC5 readthrough) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring BIVM (basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing) and ERCC5 (excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 5) genes on chromosome 13. The read-through transcript encodes a fusion protein that shares sequence identity with the products of each individual gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

BIVM-ERCC5 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0045562685).

BP6

Variant 13-102862938-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-102862938-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 134195.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {not_provided=1, Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr13-102862938-G-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ERCC5	NM_000123.4 link	c.1789G>C	p.Val597Leu	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 15	ENST00000652225.2	NP_000114.3	P28715-1
BIVM-ERCC5	NM_001204425.2 link	c.3151G>C	p.Val1051Leu	missense_variant	Exon 16 of 23		NP_001191354.2	R4GMW8Q59FZ7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ERCC5	ENST00000652225.2 link	c.1789G>C	p.Val597Leu	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 15		NM_000123.4	ENSP00000498881.2	P28715-1
BIVM-ERCC5	ENST00000639435.1 link	c.3151G>C	p.Val1051Leu	missense_variant	Exon 18 of 25	5		ENSP00000491742.1	R4GMW8
BIVM-ERCC5	ENST00000639132.1 link	c.2464G>C	p.Val822Leu	missense_variant	Exon 17 of 24	5		ENSP00000492684.1	A0A1W2PS85

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00151

AC:

230

AN:

152228

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000265

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000941

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00290

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00134

AC:

336

AN:

251344

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00125

AC XY:

170

AN XY:

135834

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000185

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000636

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00106

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00247

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000978

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00208

AC:

3040

AN:

1461892

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00202

AC XY:

1469

AN XY:

727246

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000269

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000715

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00131

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00255

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00149

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00151

AC:

230

AN:

152346

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00126

AC XY:

AN XY:

74502

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000265

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000653

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000941

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00290

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.00241

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00150

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00485

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00182

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000681

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00337

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00141

AC:

171

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00218

EpiControl

AF:

0.00154

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:7Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Oct 30, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 03, 2021

Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The ERCC5 p.Val597Leu variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in Cosmic. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs4150319), ClinVar (classified as likely benign by DNA and Cytogenetics Diagnostics Unit, Erasmus Medical Center and Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam), and LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in control databases in 348 of 268224 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.001297 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (non-Finnish) in 285 of 118064 chromosomes (freq: 0.002414), European (Finnish) in 30 of 25106 chromosomes (freq: 0.001195), Other in 6 of 6702 chromosomes (freq: 0.000895), Latino in 22 of 35104 chromosomes (freq: 0.000627), African in 4 of 23616 chromosomes (freq: 0.000169) and South Asian in 1 of 30526 chromosomes (freq: 0.000033), but was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish or East Asian populations. The p.Val597 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Oct 01, 2022

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

ERCC5: BP4 -

Xeroderma pigmentosum, group G

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Apr 29, 2016

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 21, 2015

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 3

Uncertain:1

Sep 25, 2019

Baylor Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Sep 14, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

BIVM-ERCC5-related disorder

Benign:1

Sep 30, 2022

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

not specified

Other:1

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.11

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.74

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.83

CADD

Benign

0.0090

DANN

Benign

0.76

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.051

.;.;.;T

Eigen

Benign

-1.4

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.4

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.097

LIST_S2

Benign

0.51

T;T;.;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.0042

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0046

T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.94

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.90

.;.;.;L

PROVEAN

Benign

0.0

.;.;.;N

REVEL

Benign

0.020

Sift

Benign

0.73

.;.;.;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.72

.;.;.;T

Polyphen

0.0

.;.;.;B

Vest4

0.030

MutPred

0.31

.;.;.;Gain of catalytic residue at N602 (P = 0.159);

MVP

0.12

MPC

0.11

ClinPred

0.0053

GERP RS

-5.4

Varity_R

0.016

gMVP

0.16

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over