13-106512521-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS2
The NM_004093.4(EFNB2):c.406+8T>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000855 in 1,520,842 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004093.4 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFNB2 | NM_004093.4 | c.406+8T>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000646441.1 | NP_004084.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFNB2 | ENST00000646441.1 | c.406+8T>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | NM_004093.4 | ENSP00000493716 | P1 | ||||
ENST00000646480.1 | n.497-3612A>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | ||||||||
EFNB2 | ENST00000643990.1 | n.10+3917T>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152122Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000137 AC: 3AN: 219236Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000835 AC XY: 1AN XY: 119756
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000804 AC: 11AN: 1368720Hom.: 0 Cov.: 27 AF XY: 0.00000735 AC XY: 5AN XY: 679862
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152122Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74304
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 31, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at