13-110175233-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001845.6(COL4A1):​c.3183G>A​(p.Gly1061Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.36 in 1,613,402 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 105,559 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.34 ( 8758 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.36 ( 96801 hom. )

Consequence

COL4A1
NM_001845.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.933

Publications

22 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL4A1 (HGNC:2202): (collagen type IV alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes a type IV collagen alpha protein. Type IV collagen proteins are integral components of basement membranes. This gene shares a bidirectional promoter with a paralogous gene on the opposite strand. The protein consists of an amino-terminal 7S domain, a triple-helix forming collagenous domain, and a carboxy-terminal non-collagenous domain. It functions as part of a heterotrimer and interacts with other extracellular matrix components such as perlecans, proteoglycans, and laminins. In addition, proteolytic cleavage of the non-collagenous carboxy-terminal domain results in a biologically active fragment known as arresten, which has anti-angiogenic and tumor suppressor properties. Mutations in this gene cause porencephaly, cerebrovascular disease, and renal and muscular defects. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2014]
COL4A1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • brain small vessel disease 1 with or without ocular anomalies
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
  • autosomal dominant familial hematuria-retinal arteriolar tortuosity-contractures syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
  • microangiopathy and leukoencephalopathy, pontine, autosomal dominant
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • familial porencephaly
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • pontine autosomal dominant microangiopathy with leukoencephalopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • retinal arterial tortuosity
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy, type A
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.76).
BP6
Variant 13-110175233-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-110175233-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 258250.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.933 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.365 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
COL4A1NM_001845.6 linkc.3183G>A p.Gly1061Gly synonymous_variant Exon 37 of 52 ENST00000375820.10 NP_001836.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
COL4A1ENST00000375820.10 linkc.3183G>A p.Gly1061Gly synonymous_variant Exon 37 of 52 1 NM_001845.6 ENSP00000364979.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.339
AC:
51463
AN:
151836
Hom.:
8744
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.276
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.562
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.362
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.340
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.294
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.361
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.351
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.297
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.369
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.351
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.354
AC:
88898
AN:
251122
AF XY:
0.355
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.278
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.393
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.315
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.297
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.352
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.363
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.350
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.362
AC:
528879
AN:
1461448
Hom.:
96801
Cov.:
48
AF XY:
0.362
AC XY:
263242
AN XY:
727056
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.268
AC:
8978
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.391
AC:
17472
AN:
44702
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.318
AC:
8314
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.265
AC:
10520
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.365
AC:
31441
AN:
86246
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.357
AC:
19033
AN:
53386
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.263
AC:
1514
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.369
AC:
410247
AN:
1111662
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.354
AC:
21360
AN:
60384
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.457
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
19045
38090
57135
76180
95225
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
12970
25940
38910
51880
64850
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.339
AC:
51515
AN:
151954
Hom.:
8758
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.339
AC XY:
25176
AN XY:
74238
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.276
AC:
11457
AN:
41472
American (AMR)
AF:
0.362
AC:
5532
AN:
15268
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.340
AC:
1177
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.295
AC:
1522
AN:
5164
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.361
AC:
1746
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.351
AC:
3703
AN:
10548
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.292
AC:
84
AN:
288
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.369
AC:
25034
AN:
67902
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.356
AC:
751
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1816
3632
5449
7265
9081
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
524
1048
1572
2096
2620
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.347
Hom.:
4823
Bravo
AF:
0.337
Asia WGS
AF:
0.355
AC:
1234
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.355
EpiControl
AF:
0.353

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Jun 02, 2021
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 19, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Feb 17, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Brain small vessel disease 1 with or without ocular anomalies Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Autosomal dominant familial hematuria-retinal arteriolar tortuosity-contractures syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.76
CADD
Benign
0.70
DANN
Benign
0.50
PhyloP100
-0.93
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.050
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs874204; hg19: chr13-110827580; COSMIC: COSV65421075; API