13-20187885-T-C

Position:

• chr13-20187885-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_Strong BP6

The NM_004004.6(GJB2):​c.*1016A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00162 in 152,296 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0016 (0 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 (0 hom.)
  • Failed GnomAD Quality Control
• Consequence: GJB2 NM_004004.6 3_prime_UTR
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1 B:2
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -1.51

Genes affected

GJB2 (HGNC:4284): (gap junction protein beta 2) This gene encodes a member of the gap junction protein family. The gap junctions were first characterized by electron microscopy as regionally specialized structures on plasma membranes of contacting adherent cells. These structures were shown to consist of cell-to-cell channels that facilitate the transfer of ions and small molecules between cells. The gap junction proteins, also known as connexins, purified from fractions of enriched gap junctions from different tissues differ. According to sequence similarities at the nucleotide and amino acid levels, the gap junction proteins are divided into two categories, alpha and beta. Mutations in this gene are responsible for as much as 50% of pre-lingual, recessive deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
• BP6: Variant 13-20187885-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-20187885-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 311359.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=1}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
GJB2	NM_004004.6	c.*1016A>G		3_prime_UTR_variant	2/2	ENST00000382848.5
GJB2	XM_011535049.3	c.*1016A>G		3_prime_UTR_variant	2/2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
GJB2	ENST00000382848.5	c.*1016A>G		3_prime_UTR_variant	2/2	1	NM_004004.6	P1
GJB2	ENST00000382844.2	c.*1016A>G		3_prime_UTR_variant	1/1			P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00163 AC: 248 AN: 152178 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.000531

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00203

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00288

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00269

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00316

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00247

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00143

GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 4 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0 AN XY: 4

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00162 AC: 247 AN: 152296 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00161 AC XY: 120 AN XY: 74470

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.000529

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00203

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00288

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00248

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00247

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00142

Alfa AF: 0.00169 Hom.: 1

Bravo AF: 0.00176

Asia WGS AF: 0.000866 AC: 3 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1 Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Ichthyosis, hystrix-like, with hearing loss Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 3A Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.91
CADD	Benign	0.41
DANN	Benign	0.46

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs537683957; hg19: chr13-20762024;