13-20189197-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM1BP4

The ENST00000382848.5(GJB2):​c.385G>A​(p.Glu129Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000527 in 1,613,818 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. E129E) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000054 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

GJB2
ENST00000382848.5 missense

Scores

1
7
11

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.24
Variant links:
Genes affected
GJB2 (HGNC:4284): (gap junction protein beta 2) This gene encodes a member of the gap junction protein family. The gap junctions were first characterized by electron microscopy as regionally specialized structures on plasma membranes of contacting adherent cells. These structures were shown to consist of cell-to-cell channels that facilitate the transfer of ions and small molecules between cells. The gap junction proteins, also known as connexins, purified from fractions of enriched gap junctions from different tissues differ. According to sequence similarities at the nucleotide and amino acid levels, the gap junction proteins are divided into two categories, alpha and beta. Mutations in this gene are responsible for as much as 50% of pre-lingual, recessive deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 5 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 3 benign, 5 uncertain in ENST00000382848.5
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.30677164).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
GJB2NM_004004.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.385G>A p.Glu129Lys missense_variant 2/2 ENST00000382848.5 NP_003995.2 P29033H9U1J4
GJB2XM_011535049.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.385G>A p.Glu129Lys missense_variant 2/2 XP_011533351.1 P29033H9U1J4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GJB2ENST00000382848.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.385G>A p.Glu129Lys missense_variant 2/21 NM_004004.6 ENSP00000372299.4 P29033
GJB2ENST00000382844.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.385G>A p.Glu129Lys missense_variant 1/16 ENSP00000372295.1 P29033

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000394
AC:
6
AN:
152206
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000639
AC:
16
AN:
250484
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000738
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
135498
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000116
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000973
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000540
AC:
79
AN:
1461612
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000564
AC XY:
41
AN XY:
727104
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000112
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000188
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000629
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000497
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000394
AC:
6
AN:
152206
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000134
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74356
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000657
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000567
ExAC
AF:
0.0000659
AC:
8
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJun 30, 2022The p.Glu129Lys variant in GJB2 has been reported in 5 individuals with sensorineural hearing loss (Kenna 2001, Dalamón 2005, Najmabadi 2005, Primignani 2009, Putcha 2007). Only 1 of these individuals had a variant on the other allele, though the one other variant (Ala40Gly) is also of unknown significance. In another family, both the father and proband had unilateral high frequency sensorineural hearing loss raising the possibility of a dominant pattern of inheritance (Kenna 2001) though this is not consistent with the other 4 cases in the literature. This variant has not been identified in large and broad ethnically-matched populations by NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS). Computational analyses (biochemical amino acid properties, conservation, AlignGVGD, PolyPhen2, and SIFT) suggest that the variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, additional data is needed to determine the clinical significance of this variant; however, given the absence of clear disease-causing variants on the second allele of any of the reported case, we would lean towards a more likely benign interpretation. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BP2. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 18, 2024Observed multiple times in individuals with hearing loss; however, it is most commonly observed as heterozygous in cases of sporadic hearing loss where no other GJB2 variant is identified (PMID: 15666300, 17671735, 24158611); Also observed on the opposite allele (in trans) from the c.35delG pathogenic variant in an individual without hearing loss (PMID: 21916817); In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22695344, 11556849, 24158611, 25447126, 25388846, 24156272, 28483220, 19887791, 19081147, 19371219, 17666888, 15964725, 17671735, 25012701, 12172394, 12925341, 21916817, 30245029, 30275481, 33096615, 27169813, 15666300) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpMar 29, 2022This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 129 of the GJB2 protein (p.Glu129Lys). This variant is present in population databases (rs397516875, gnomAD 0.01%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with GJB2-related conditions (PMID: 19371219, 33096615). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 44747). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt GJB2 protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Dec 12, 2017- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Childrens Research InstituteSep 12, 2017A heterozygous missense variant was identified, NM_004004.5(GJB2):c.385G>A in exon 2 of the GJB2 gene. This substitution creates a minor amino acid change from an glutamic acid to a lysine at position 129, NP_003995.2(GJB2):p.(Glu129Lys). The glutamic acid at this position has low conservation (100 vertebrates, UCSC). In silico predictions of the pathogenicity of this variant are conflicting (Polyphen, SIFT, CADD, Mutation Taster). This variant has been previously observed in other deafness cases (Kenna, MA. et al. (2001), Dalamon, V. et al. (2005), Wu, B-L. et al. (2002) and Toth, T. et al. (2007)) and reported as PATHOGENIC in the Deafness Variation Database but evidence for its pathogenicity is conflicting and it is designated as a variant of uncertain significance in ClinVar. This variant is present in the gnomAD population database at a frequency of 0.0057% (14/245256, 0 hom). It is not situated in a known functional domain. The homozygous presence of the NM_004004.5(GJB2):c.101T>C variant in the same patient suggests that this variant (NM_004004.5(GJB2):c.385G>A) is in cis with one of the alleles. Based on current information, this variant has been classified as a VARIANT of UNKNOWN SIGNIFICANCE (VUS). -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 26, 2023Variant summary: GJB2 c.385G>A (p.Glu129Lys) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Connexin, N-terminal (IPR013092) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 6.4e-05 in 250484 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in GJB2 causing Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss (6.4e-05 vs 0.00034), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.385G>A has been reported in the literature in heterozygous individuals affected with Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss (Example: Buonfiglio_2020, Dalamn_2005, Kenna_2001, Putcha_2007, Tth_2007, Wu_2002), and also observed in an unaffected child with a pathogenic variant (Chinetti_2011). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 33096615, 21916817, 15964725, 24158611, 11556849, 17666888, 17671735, 12172394).Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and all laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance citing overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingINGEBI, INGEBI / CONICETAug 31, 2020Based on ACMG/AMP guidelines and Hearing Loss Expert Panel specific criteria: the filtering allele frequency of c.385G>A, p.(Glu129Lys) variant in GJB2 gene is 0,00385% (4/35432 Latino alleles with 95%CI) from Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; calculated by using inverse allele frequency at https://www.cardiodb.org/allelefrequencyapp/) which meets the criteria to apply to PM2 rule. Computational evidence was not enough to neither apply to PP3 nor BP4 since REVEL score was 0.560. The p.(Glu129Lys) change has been identified in heterozygous state in six patients (PMID: 15666300, 17666888, 15964725, 11556849). In addition, it was reported (PMID: 11556849) that this variant could segregate in a dominant mode (data not shown) in patient with unilateral high frequency hearing loss and his affected father. However, since segregation analysis was not performed, this information was not counted. On the other hand, p.(Glu129Lys) has been identified in trans with a presumed pathogenic variant (p.Ala40Gly) (PMID: 19371219) meeting PM3 criteria. In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is currently uncertain (PM2, PM3). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.13
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.15
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.18
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.49
T;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.35
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.23
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.34
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.72
.;.;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.098
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.31
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.033
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.7
L;L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
0.99
N;N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.52
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.29
N;N;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.56
Sift
Benign
0.51
T;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.53
T;T;.
Polyphen
0.30
B;B;B
Vest4
0.19
MVP
0.86
MPC
0.042
ClinPred
0.058
T
GERP RS
4.6
Varity_R
0.36
gMVP
0.85

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs397516875; hg19: chr13-20763336; COSMIC: COSV67010710; API