13-23279408-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000231.3(SGCG):c.435C>T(p.Asn145Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00167 in 1,613,022 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 39 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0089 ( 25 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00091 ( 14 hom. )

Consequence

SGCG
NM_000231.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0630

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

SGCG (HGNC:10809): (sarcoglycan gamma) This gene encodes gamma-sarcoglycan, one of several sarcolemmal transmembrane glycoproteins that interact with dystrophin. The dystrophin-glycoprotein complex (DGC) spans the sarcolemma and is comprised of dystrophin, syntrophin, alpha- and beta-dystroglycans and sarcoglycans. The DGC provides a structural link between the subsarcolemmal cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix of muscle cells. Defects in the encoded protein can lead to early onset autosomal recessive muscular dystrophy, in particular limb-girdle muscular dystrophy, type 2C (LGMD2C). [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

SGCG Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2C
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Myriad Women’s Health, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics

SGCG links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.76).

BP6

Variant 13-23279408-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-23279408-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 130295.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.063 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00894 (1360/152178) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0305 (1264/41500). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0291. There are 25 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 648 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 25 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SGCG	NM_000231.3 link	c.435C>T	p.Asn145Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 8	ENST00000218867.4	NP_000222.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SGCG	ENST00000218867.4 link	c.435C>T	p.Asn145Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 8	1	NM_000231.3	ENSP00000218867.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00890

AC:

1354

AN:

152060

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0304

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00464

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000191

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00574

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00228

AC:

572

AN:

251284

AF XY:

0.00158

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0309

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00156

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000880

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000490

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000913

AC:

1334

AN:

1460844

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000813

AC XY:

591

AN XY:

726744

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0322

AC:

1077

AN:

33450

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00157

AC:

AN:

44714

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26116

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39638

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000128

AC:

AN:

86236

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53344

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00104

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000333

AC:

AN:

1111236

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00219

AC:

132

AN:

60344

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.458

Heterozygous variant carriers

135

203

270

338

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

108

144

180

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00894

AC:

1360

AN:

152178

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00871

AC XY:

648

AN XY:

74382

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0305

AC:

1264

AN:

41500

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00464

AC:

AN:

15306

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5170

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4814

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10594

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000191

AC:

AN:

68012

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00568

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.493

Heterozygous variant carriers

134

202

269

336

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00481

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0102

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Mar 03, 2016

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Oct 16, 2023

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2C

Benign:2

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Sarcoglycanopathy

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.76

CADD

Benign

1.2

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.58

PhyloP100

0.063

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over