13-24892636-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_018451.5(CENPJ):c.3216+7A>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.815 in 1,611,198 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 538,374 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018451.5 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CENPJ | NM_018451.5 | c.3216+7A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000381884.9 | NP_060921.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CENPJ | ENST00000381884.9 | c.3216+7A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_018451.5 | ENSP00000371308.4 | ||||
CENPJ | ENST00000418179.1 | c.459+7A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000399334.1 | |||||
CENPJ | ENST00000616936.4 | n.3216+7A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000477511.1 | |||||
CENPJ | ENST00000545981.6 | n.3216+7A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 2 | ENSP00000441090.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.777 AC: 118044AN: 151832Hom.: 46453 Cov.: 29
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.808 AC: 203202AN: 251418Hom.: 82949 AF XY: 0.801 AC XY: 108889AN XY: 135900
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.819 AC: 1195413AN: 1459248Hom.: 491891 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.815 AC XY: 591576AN XY: 726116
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.777 AC: 118120AN: 151950Hom.: 46483 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.778 AC XY: 57782AN XY: 74268
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 09, 2014 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Apr 20, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Seckel syndrome 4 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 22, 2021 | - - |
Microcephaly 6, primary, autosomal recessive Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 22, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at