13-31247855-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_194318.4(B3GLCT):​c.348T>C​(p.His116His) variant causes a splice region, synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.98 in 1,541,690 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 740,651 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.97 ( 71544 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.98 ( 669107 hom. )

Consequence

B3GLCT
NM_194318.4 splice_region, synonymous

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0005678
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.312
Variant links:
Genes affected
B3GLCT (HGNC:20207): (beta 3-glucosyltransferase) The protein encoded by this gene is a beta-1,3-glucosyltransferase that transfers glucose to O-linked fucosylglycans on thrombospondin type-1 repeats (TSRs) of several proteins. The encoded protein is a type II membrane protein. Defects in this gene are a cause of Peters-plus syndrome (PPS).[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
BP6
Variant 13-31247855-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-31247855-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 96628.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr13-31247855-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.312 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.977 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
B3GLCTNM_194318.4 linkc.348T>C p.His116His splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 15 ENST00000343307.5 NP_919299.3 Q6Y288

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
B3GLCTENST00000343307.5 linkc.348T>C p.His116His splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 15 1 NM_194318.4 ENSP00000343002.4 Q6Y288

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.969
AC:
147477
AN:
152180
Hom.:
71508
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.929
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.987
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.983
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.993
Gnomad EAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.994
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.993
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.978
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.981
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.974
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.984
AC:
245398
AN:
249382
Hom.:
120763
AF XY:
0.985
AC XY:
132799
AN XY:
134804
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.927
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.990
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.996
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.994
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.993
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.982
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.987
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.981
AC:
1363453
AN:
1389392
Hom.:
669107
Cov.:
21
AF XY:
0.982
AC XY:
683161
AN XY:
695672
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.926
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.989
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.995
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.994
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.992
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.980
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.981
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.969
AC:
147571
AN:
152298
Hom.:
71544
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.971
AC XY:
72283
AN XY:
74474
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.928
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.983
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.993
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.994
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.993
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.981
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.974
Alfa
AF:
0.980
Hom.:
106633
Bravo
AF:
0.966
Asia WGS
AF:
0.991
AC:
3441
AN:
3472
EpiCase
AF:
0.984
EpiControl
AF:
0.983

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
May 04, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Peters plus syndrome Benign:4
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 14, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 11, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Jun 14, 2018
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.80
CADD
Benign
5.8
DANN
Benign
0.47

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00057
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.060
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4943266; hg19: chr13-31821992; API