13-32319134-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.125A>G​(p.Tyr42Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00207 in 1,613,770 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0021 ( 10 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

2
14

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:37O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.845
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009805024).
BP6
Variant 13-32319134-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32319134-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 37734.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32319134-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-32319134-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 10 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.125A>G p.Tyr42Cys missense_variant 3/27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.125A>G p.Tyr42Cys missense_variant 3/275 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00152
AC:
232
AN:
152196
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000531
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00160
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00248
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00163
AC:
409
AN:
251278
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00169
AC XY:
229
AN XY:
135850
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000954
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00149
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00186
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00222
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00213
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00164
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00213
AC:
3109
AN:
1461456
Hom.:
10
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00215
AC XY:
1563
AN XY:
727048
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000120
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00238
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00251
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00227
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00222
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00152
AC:
232
AN:
152314
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00145
AC XY:
108
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000529
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000457
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00160
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00248
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000946
Alfa
AF:
0.00201
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00140
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00189
AC:
7
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00182
AC:
7
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000908
AC:
4
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00326
AC:
28
ExAC
AF:
0.00169
AC:
205
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00245
EpiControl
AF:
0.00196

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:37Other:2
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:13Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMay 24, 2016- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBRCAlab, Lund UniversityMar 02, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMichigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of MichiganNov 03, 2014- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtOct 09, 2014- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPathway GenomicsOct 30, 2014- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Aug 10, 2015IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 1.22E-18. Also class 1 based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.04021 (Asian), 0.1016 (African), 0.04749 (European), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30). -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)May 01, 2012- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
not provided, no classification providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)-- -
not specified Benign:10Other:1
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer AgencyApr 18, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)May 19, 2015- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 28, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoMay 25, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesMar 23, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, flagged submissionresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicMay 15, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2024BRCA2: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthNov 25, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsOct 10, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Oct 16, 2020- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpOct 09, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateNov 16, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchGenetics Program, Instituto Nacional de CancerNov 01, 2021- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioApr 14, 2023- -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsFeb 23, 2017- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.062
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.52
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
CADD
Benign
1.6
DANN
Benign
0.49
Eigen
Benign
-0.98
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.93
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.76
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.088
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0098
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.76
T
MutationTaster
Benign
0.79
D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.34
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.3
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.089
Sift
Benign
0.11
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.11
T;T
Vest4
0.31
MVP
0.78
MPC
0.023
ClinPred
0.0018
T
GERP RS
0.28
gMVP
0.40

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4987046; hg19: chr13-32893271; COSMIC: COSV104701240; COSMIC: COSV104701240; API