13-32319224-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM5BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):ā€‹c.215A>Gā€‹(p.Asn72Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000093 in 1,613,762 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N72I?) has been classified as Pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0000089 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.87
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr13-32319223-AA-ATT is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.053176194).
BP6
Variant 13-32319224-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32319224-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 51251.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=4, Benign=1}. Variant chr13-32319224-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.215A>G p.Asn72Ser missense_variant 3/27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3 P51587

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.215A>G p.Asn72Ser missense_variant 3/275 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3 P51587
BRCA2ENST00000530893 linkuse as main transcriptc.-155A>G 5_prime_UTR_variant 3/271 ENSP00000499438.2 A0A590UJI7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.215A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 2/262 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152238
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000385
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000398
AC:
10
AN:
251386
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000515
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
135870
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000889
AC:
13
AN:
1461524
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00000963
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
727094
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000328
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152238
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000134
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74366
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000385
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000227
ExAC
AF:
0.0000247
AC:
3

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJan 06, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)Sep 18, 2010- -
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 27, 2023In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Also known as 443A>G; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10923033, 18627636, 28222693, 22476429, 28873162, 30287823, 31925297, 32377563, 30702160, 30883759, 32467295, 31837001, 31853058) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicNov 06, 2020- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthDec 02, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsApr 14, 2021This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpOct 18, 2021Variant summary: BRCA2 c.215A>G (p.Ser215Arg) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-05 in 251386 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (4e-05 vs 0.00075), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.215A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer (example, Thirthagiri_2008, Lu_2012, Lai_2017) and unaffected healthy control individuals (example Lai_2017, Momozawa_2018, and Guo_2019) . These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Five laboratories have classified the variant as unknown significance and two laboratories classified the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS. -
Infiltrating duct carcinoma of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testing3DMed Clinical Laboratory IncMay 21, 2018- -
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyCenter for Precision Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital-- -
Ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Birth Defects, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan UniversityJan 01, 2022- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 17, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.072
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.44
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.51
CADD
Benign
9.3
DANN
Benign
0.62
Eigen
Benign
-0.99
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.87
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.44
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.020
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.053
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.96
T
PrimateAI
Benign
0.35
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.67
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.18
Sift
Benign
0.48
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.62
T;T
Vest4
0.18
MutPred
0.11
Gain of phosphorylation at N72 (P = 0.0563);Gain of phosphorylation at N72 (P = 0.0563);
MVP
0.78
MPC
0.023
ClinPred
0.0085
T
GERP RS
2.6
gMVP
0.088

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs276174818; hg19: chr13-32893361; API