13-32326142-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 4P and 1B. PM1PP3_ModerateBP6
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.467A>G(p.Asp156Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000367 in 1,609,358 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D156E) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.467A>G | p.Asp156Gly | missense_variant | 5/27 | ENST00000380152.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.467A>G | p.Asp156Gly | missense_variant | 5/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000184 AC: 28AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000717 AC: 18AN: 251052Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000442 AC XY: 6AN XY: 135768
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000213 AC: 31AN: 1457012Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000234 AC XY: 17AN XY: 725038
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000184 AC: 28AN: 152346Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000188 AC XY: 14AN XY: 74492
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University | Apr 20, 2017 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 27, 2018 | The BRCA2 c.467A>G; p.Asp156Gly variant (rs68071147) is reported in the literature in several individuals affected with breast and/or ovarian cancer (Capanu 2011, Sanz 2010, Suter 2004). This variant is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 51694) and is found in the African population with an overall allele frequency of 0.05% (13/24012 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. The aspartate at codon 156 is weakly conserved, and computational analyses (SIFT: damaging, PolyPhen-2: benign) predict conflicting effects of this variant on protein structure/function. Analyses of splicing (Alamut v.2.11) predict that this variant creates a novel cryptic splice donor site, and mRNA studies indicate that splicing occurs at this cryptic site, resulting in an in-frame deletion of 9 nucleotides at the end of exon 5 (Houdayer 2012, Sanz 2010). However, due to limited information on the clinical impact of the p.Asp156Gly variant, its significance is uncertain at this time. References: Capanu M et al. Assessment of rare BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of unknown significance using hierarchical modeling. Genet Epidemiol. 2011 Jul;35(5):389-97. Houdayer C et al. Guidelines for splicing analysis in molecular diagnosis derived from a set of 327 combined in silico/in vitro studies on BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. Hum Mutat. 2012 Aug;33(8):1228-38. Sanz DJ et al. A high proportion of DNA variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2 is associated with aberrant splicing in breast/ovarian cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Mar 15;16(6):1957-67. Suter NM et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women from Shanghai China. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004 Feb;13(2):181-9. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Research Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto | Jan 31, 2014 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Nov 20, 2017 | - - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Pathway Genomics | Oct 30, 2014 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Jul 09, 2007 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:3Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 24, 2023 | In the published literature, this variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer or at high risk for breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMIDs: 14973102 (2004), 20104584 (2010), 26941049 (2016), 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/BRCA2)) and prostate cancer (PMID: 36898365 (2023)). Experimental studies suggest that this variant may generate a cryptic splice donor site, resulting in an in-frame deletion of three amino acids (PMIDs: 22505045 (2012), 20215541 (2010), 30233647 (2018), and 30883759 (2019)). An additional functional study determined this variant results in normal function when cells are treated with PARP inhibitors, however, the effect of this variant on the full spectrum of BRCA2 protein function was not investigated (PMID: 32444794 (2020)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00056 (14/24866 chromosomes in African/African American subpop subpopulation, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is deleterious or benign. Additional analysis using software algorithms for the prediction of the effect of nucleotide changes on BRCA2 mRNA splicing yielded predictions that this variant may result in the gain of a cryptic splice site without affecting the natural splice sites . Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 31, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21520273, 22505045, 20215541, 20104584, 14973102, 23893897, 20167696, 26941049, 16683254, 23348723, 30883759, 31131967, 31825140) - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Apr 25, 2016 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 18, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Aug 01, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at