13-32326617-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 3P and 1B. PM2PP5BP4

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.631+4A>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000708 in 1,412,984 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 7.1e-7 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.9441
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:4U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.68
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP5
Variant 13-32326617-A-G is Pathogenic according to our data. Variant chr13-32326617-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 52056.We mark this variant Likely_pathogenic, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Pathogenic=1, Likely_pathogenic=3}. Variant chr13-32326617-A-G is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53). . Strength limited to SUPPORTING due to the PP5.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.631+4A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3 P51587

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.631+4A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant 5 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3 P51587
BRCA2ENST00000530893.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.262+4A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant 1 ENSP00000499438.2 A0A590UJI7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.631+4A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant 2 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
33
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
7.08e-7
AC:
1
AN:
1412984
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
705400
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000226
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
33
Bravo
AF:
0.00000378

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:4Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Pathogenic:2
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingConsortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA), c/o University of CambridgeOct 02, 2015- -
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingDepartment of Medical Genetics, Oslo University HospitalJul 17, 2017- -
not provided Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAiLife Diagnostics, AiLife DiagnosticsApr 01, 2020- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpAug 22, 2022In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic. Variants that disrupt the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Studies have shown that this variant alters mRNA splicing and is expected to lead to the loss of protein expression (PMID: 20455026, 31143303). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 52056). This variant has been observed in individual(s) with a personal and/or family history of breast and ovarian cancer (PMID: 29339979, 29446198). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change falls in intron 7 of the BRCA2 gene. It does not directly change the encoded amino acid sequence of the BRCA2 protein. RNA analysis indicates that this variant induces altered splicing and may result in an absent or disrupted protein product. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJan 28, 2021The c.631+4A>G intronic variant results from an A to G substitution 4 nucleotides after coding exon 6 in the BRCA2 gene. This alteration was seen in a patient diagnosed with breast and ovarian cancer in her 50s. This patient also carried BRCA1 p.R1699Q, which is thought to be a moderate risk mutation. Family history was significant for breast cancer in the patient's sister and father, who were diagnosed at ages 43 and 76, respectively. Somatic testing indicated that the father carried both alterations. In addition, RT-PCR demonstrated skipping of coding exon 6 (Steffensen AY et al. Fam. Cancer. 2010 Sep;9(3):283-7; Wangensteen T et al. Hered Cancer Clin Pract, 2019 May;17:14). This nucleotide position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. However, this alteration may be partially rescued by alternative splicing as it demonstrated only 50% loss of homology directed DNA repair activity (Mesman RLS et al. Genet Med, 2020 Aug;22:1355-1365). Since supporting evidence is conflicting at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
CADD
Benign
3.8
DANN
Benign
0.76

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.94
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.65
SpliceAI score (max)
0.71
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DL_spliceai
0.71
Position offset: -4

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs397507841; hg19: chr13-32900754; API