13-32330945-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.708T>C​(p.His236=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000174 in 1,612,630 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000017 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.843
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.7).
BP6
Variant 13-32330945-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32330945-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 184021.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32330945-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr13-32330945-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.843 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.708T>C p.His236= synonymous_variant 9/27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.708T>C p.His236= synonymous_variant 9/275 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152196
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000577
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000240
AC:
6
AN:
250414
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000295
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
135390
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000171
AC:
25
AN:
1460316
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0000193
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
726546
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000756
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000349
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000630
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000199
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152314
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000403
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000578
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.00000756
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:14
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesMay 28, 2021- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoFeb 10, 2023- -
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoFeb 25, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 25, 2019Variant summary: BRCA2 c.708T>C alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.5e-05 in 275394 control chromosomes (gnomAD and Momozawa 2018). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.708T>C in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Seven other submitters including one expert panel have provided clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and classified the variant as benign (1x) / likely benign (6x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 15, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jun 07, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJul 18, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 08, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingFoulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical ResearchMay 26, 2014- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioFeb 19, 2016- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Jun 29, 2017Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to result in a splicing aberration (Splicing prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/). -
BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMar 21, 2023This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 30, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.70
CADD
Benign
5.5
DANN
Benign
0.21

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs185506536; hg19: chr13-32905082; API