13-32330945-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.708T>C(p.His236=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000174 in 1,612,630 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000017 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA2
NM_000059.4 synonymous
NM_000059.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.843
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.7).
BP6
Variant 13-32330945-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32330945-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 184021.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32330945-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr13-32330945-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.843 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.708T>C | p.His236= | synonymous_variant | 9/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.708T>C | p.His236= | synonymous_variant | 9/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152196Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
152196
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000240 AC: 6AN: 250414Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000295 AC XY: 4AN XY: 135390
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
250414
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
135390
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000171 AC: 25AN: 1460316Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000193 AC XY: 14AN XY: 726546
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
25
AN:
1460316
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
726546
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152314Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74484
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
152314
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74484
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:14
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | May 28, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Feb 10, 2023 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 25, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 25, 2019 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.708T>C alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.5e-05 in 275394 control chromosomes (gnomAD and Momozawa 2018). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.708T>C in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Seven other submitters including one expert panel have provided clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and classified the variant as benign (1x) / likely benign (6x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 15, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jun 07, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jul 18, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 08, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Foulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research | May 26, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Feb 19, 2016 | - - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Jun 29, 2017 | Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to result in a splicing aberration (Splicing prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/). - |
BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 21, 2023 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at