13-32333247-T-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.1769T>G(p.Phe590Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000062 in 1,611,694 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000055 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.59

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

BP6

Variant 13-32333247-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32333247-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 51189.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=5}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4 link	c.1769T>G	p.Phe590Cys	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 27	ENST00000380152.8	NP_000050.3	P51587

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8 link	c.1769T>G	p.Phe590Cys	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 27	5	NM_000059.4	ENSP00000369497.3	P51587
BRCA2	ENST00000530893.7 link	c.1400T>G	p.Phe467Cys	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 27	1		ENSP00000499438.2	A0A590UJI7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2 link	n.1769T>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 9 of 26	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152128

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000121

AC:

AN:

248932

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000148

AC XY:

AN XY:

134758

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000177

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000165

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000548

AC:

AN:

1459566

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000689

AC XY:

AN XY:

726122

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000720

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152128

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000135

AC XY:

AN XY:

74288

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000478

Alfa

AF:

0.0000312

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000378

ExAC

AF:

0.0000165

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Uncertain:2Benign:2

Sep 01, 2023

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

BS3(Strong)+BP1(Strong)+BP5(Supporting) according to ACMG/AMP classification guidelines specified for BRCA1 & BRCA2 (Classification Criteria V1.0.0 2023-09-08 - https://cspec.genome.network/cspec/ui/svi/affiliation/50087) (PMID: 38160042) -

Dec 11, 2015

Counsyl

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2012

Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 29, 2002

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Apr 04, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Oct 06, 2020

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Sep 15, 2017

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 23, 2023

University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jul 25, 2023

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In the published literature, this variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer (PMID: 35402282 (2022), 34178674 (2021), 32854451 (2020)), and Cowden Syndrome/Cowden Syndrome-like Bannayan-Riley Ruvalcaba Syndrome (PMID: 29684080 (2018)). Published functional studies have reported that this variant does not have a deleterious effect on BRCA2 protein function (PMID: 29988080 (2018)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000012 (3/248932 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is benign or damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

Mar 26, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; A published in vitro functional assay suggests that this variant is able to rescue cell lethality (Mesman 2018); Observed in at least one individual with breast or ovarian cancer (Azzollini 2016); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25348012, 11929857, 29988080, 24817641, 27062684, 32854451, 29684080) -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Sep 28, 2018

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.1769T>G (p.Phe590Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.2e-05 in 244108 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1769T>G has been reported in the literature in an individual affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer who was indicated to carry another pathogenic variant, although the variant was not specified (Azzollini_2016). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. The most pronounced variant effect results in normal activity using multiple independent measures namely, complementation by BRCA2 variants of the cell lethal phenotype imposed by Cre-mediated loss of Brca2; HDR capacity, as measured by the repair of I-Sce1 induced double strand breaks (DSBs); and Cisplatin sensitivity of BRCA2 variants (Meman_2018). Four ClinVar submissions from clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) cites the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Uncertain:1

May 07, 2019

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 07, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.71

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.15

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

-0.010

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.70

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.68

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.96

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.11

MetaRNN

Uncertain

0.58

D;D

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.2

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.61

PROVEAN

Benign

-2.0

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.22

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.0070

D;D

Vest4

0.53

MutPred

0.51

Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0815);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0815);

MVP

0.93

MPC

0.17

ClinPred

0.73

GERP RS

5.5

gMVP

0.58

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over