Menu
GeneBe

13-32333264-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.1786G>C(p.Asp596His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000535 in 1,608,472 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D596G) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00024 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00057 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

8
8

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:36O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.855
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.1367839).
BP6
Variant 13-32333264-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32333264-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 51192.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32333264-G-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-32333264-G-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1786G>C p.Asp596His missense_variant 10/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1786G>C p.Asp596His missense_variant 10/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000243
AC:
37
AN:
152082
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000966
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000485
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000337
AC:
83
AN:
246030
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000315
AC XY:
42
AN XY:
133164
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000126
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000595
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000464
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000689
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000168
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000565
AC:
823
AN:
1456390
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000566
AC XY:
410
AN XY:
724436
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000228
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000375
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000722
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000249
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000243
AC:
37
AN:
152082
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000188
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
74274
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000966
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000485
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000386
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000298
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00189
AC:
7
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000465
AC:
4
ExAC
AF:
0.000404
AC:
49
EpiCase
AF:
0.000818
EpiControl
AF:
0.000653

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:36Other:2
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:12Other:1
not provided, no classification providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of BolognaSep 01, 2023BS1(Strong)+BP1(Strong)+BP5(Strong) according to ACMG/AMP classification guidelines specified for BRCA1 & BRCA2 (Classification Criteria V1.0.0 2023-09-08 - https://cspec.genome.network/cspec/ui/svi/affiliation/50087) (PMID: 38160042) -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtOct 09, 2014- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaAug 30, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Jun 18, 2019IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000066 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBRCAlab, Lund UniversityMar 02, 2020- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)May 01, 2012- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyCounsylJan 02, 2014- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMichigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of MichiganNov 03, 2014- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:8Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC: 0.1% (45/65250) European; ClinVar: 5 LB, 3 B -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoOct 21, 2019- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Apr 23, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJul 31, 2017- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer AgencyApr 18, 2017- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsFeb 17, 2017- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicApr 20, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 01, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 17997147, 24728327, 32426482, 21952622, 21520273, 25637381, 23231788, 17513806, 27153395, 26306726, 28678401, 26517685, 28439188, 20104584, 18284688, 16284991, 31131967) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJun 01, 2023BRCA2: BP1, BP4, BS2 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJan 17, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 25, 2023- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Nov 02, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthFeb 06, 2015- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingSt. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research HospitalAug 26, 2021The BRCA2 c.1786G>C (p.Asp596His) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.064% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/13-32907401-G-C). In silico tools predict a benign effect of this variant on protein function (BP4), but to our knowledge these predictions have not been confirmed by functional assays. This variant has been reported in seven women older than 70 years of age who have never had cancer (BS2_supporting; https://whi.color.com/variant/13-32907401-G-C). It has also been reported in individuals with a personal or family history of breast cancer (PMID: 17513806, 28439188, 20104584), ovarian cancer (PMID: 17997147, 18559594, 16284991), and head neck squamous cell carcinoma (PMID: 28678401). This variant has been reported to co-occur with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BP2; UMD database). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as likely benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria: BS2_supporting, BP2, BP4. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 29, 2024- -
Medulloblastoma;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C1838457:Fanconi anemia complementation group D1;C2675520:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2;C2751641:Glioma susceptibility 3;C3150546:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMar 02, 2022- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioMar 03, 2016- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaAug 30, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Breast neoplasm Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchCSER _CC_NCGL, University of WashingtonJun 01, 2014- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA2 p.Asp596His variant was identified in 7 of 7970 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with ovarian and breast cancer (Borg 2010, Brozek 2007, Lee 2008, Machado 2007, Pal 2005); however, an insufficient number of controls were included in these studies to determine the frequency of this variant in the general population. The variant was also identified by our laboratory in 2 individuals with breast cancer. The variant was identified by the Exome Variant Server project in 5 of 12995 European American/African American alleles (frequency: 0.0004), although this low number of observations and low frequency is not substantive enough to determine the prevalence of the variant in the general population and its relationship to disease. The p.Asp596 residue is conserved across most mammals, but not across lower organisms. Computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. An in silico analysis study by Lee (2008) classified this variant as low-frequency unclassified variant with medium to high risk in selected computational predictive programs; however, a population study by Pal (2005) noted that a tumour with the variant had low malignant potential. This variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs56328701) “With untested allele”, HGMD, ClinVar database, the BIC database (50X with no clinical importance), and UMD (44X as a neutral variant). In UMD the c.1786G>C variant was identified with five different co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants, increasing the likelihood that the p.Asp596His variant does not have clinical significance. In addition, the variant was classified as a benign by the Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) (submitted within the ClinVar database and derived from Myriad reports). In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.27
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.19
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.050
Cadd
Benign
23
Dann
Uncertain
0.99
Eigen
Uncertain
0.33
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.24
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.84
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.10
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.14
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationTaster
Benign
0.98
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.33
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.6
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.22
Sift
Uncertain
0.0020
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.019
D;D
Vest4
0.43
MVP
0.91
MPC
0.14
ClinPred
0.14
T
GERP RS
3.4
gMVP
0.25

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56328701; hg19: chr13-32907401; COSMIC: COSV66450982; API