13-32333264-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.1786G>C​(p.Asp596His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000535 in 1,608,472 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D596V) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00024 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00057 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

8
10

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:36O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.855

Publications

29 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
BRCA2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • Fanconi anemia complementation group D1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
  • pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • medulloblastoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.1367839).
BP6
Variant 13-32333264-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32333264-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 51192.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkc.1786G>C p.Asp596His missense_variant Exon 10 of 27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkc.1786G>C p.Asp596His missense_variant Exon 10 of 27 5 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3
BRCA2ENST00000530893.7 linkc.1417G>C p.Asp473His missense_variant Exon 10 of 27 1 ENSP00000499438.2
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkn.1786G>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 26 2 ENSP00000506251.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000243
AC:
37
AN:
152082
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000966
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000485
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000337
AC:
83
AN:
246030
AF XY:
0.000315
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000126
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000595
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000464
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000689
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000168
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000565
AC:
823
AN:
1456390
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000566
AC XY:
410
AN XY:
724436
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000121
AC:
4
AN:
33040
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000228
AC:
1
AN:
43772
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25984
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39656
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
84864
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000375
AC:
2
AN:
53346
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5732
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000722
AC:
801
AN:
1109856
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000249
AC:
15
AN:
60140
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.460
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
43
86
129
172
215
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
28
56
84
112
140
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000243
AC:
37
AN:
152082
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000188
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
74274
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000966
AC:
4
AN:
41422
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15268
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5194
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10572
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000485
AC:
33
AN:
68030
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2080
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
4
7
9
11
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000386
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000298
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00189
AC:
7
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000465
AC:
4
ExAC
AF:
0.000404
AC:
49
EpiCase
AF:
0.000818
EpiControl
AF:
0.000653

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:36Other:2
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:12Other:1
Jun 18, 2019
Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000066

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 01, 2023
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

BS1(Strong)+BP1(Strong)+BP5(Strong) according to ACMG/AMP classification guidelines specified for BRCA1 & BRCA2 (Classification Criteria V1.0.0 2023-09-08 - https://cspec.genome.network/cspec/ui/svi/affiliation/50087) (PMID: 38160042)

May 01, 2012
Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 02, 2014
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com.

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 03, 2014
Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 02, 2020
BRCAlab, Lund University
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 05, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 09, 2014
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 30, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign.

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:8Other:1
Apr 23, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 18, 2017
Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

Oct 21, 2019
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 31, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC: 0.1% (45/65250) European; ClinVar: 5 LB, 3 B

not provided Benign:6
Jan 17, 2019
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BRCA2: BP1, BP4, BS2

Feb 17, 2017
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 25, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 20, 2017
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 01, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 17997147, 24728327, 32426482, 21952622, 21520273, 25637381, 23231788, 17513806, 27153395, 26306726, 28678401, 26517685, 28439188, 20104584, 18284688, 16284991, 31131967)

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Feb 06, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 02, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Nov 19, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Aug 26, 2021
St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRCA2 c.1786G>C (p.Asp596His) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.064% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/13-32907401-G-C). In silico tools predict a benign effect of this variant on protein function (BP4), but to our knowledge these predictions have not been confirmed by functional assays. This variant has been reported in seven women older than 70 years of age who have never had cancer (BS2_supporting; https://whi.color.com/variant/13-32907401-G-C). It has also been reported in individuals with a personal or family history of breast cancer (PMID: 17513806, 28439188, 20104584), ovarian cancer (PMID: 17997147, 18559594, 16284991), and head neck squamous cell carcinoma (PMID: 28678401). This variant has been reported to co-occur with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BP2; UMD database). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as likely benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria: BS2_supporting, BP2, BP4.

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Medulloblastoma;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Prostate cancer;C1838457:Fanconi anemia complementation group D1;C2675520:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2;C2751641:Glioma susceptibility 3;C3150546:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Mar 02, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Mar 03, 2016
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Aug 30, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign.

Breast neoplasm Benign:1
Jun 01, 2014
CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:research

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRCA2 p.Asp596His variant was identified in 7 of 7970 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with ovarian and breast cancer (Borg 2010, Brozek 2007, Lee 2008, Machado 2007, Pal 2005); however, an insufficient number of controls were included in these studies to determine the frequency of this variant in the general population. The variant was also identified by our laboratory in 2 individuals with breast cancer. The variant was identified by the Exome Variant Server project in 5 of 12995 European American/African American alleles (frequency: 0.0004), although this low number of observations and low frequency is not substantive enough to determine the prevalence of the variant in the general population and its relationship to disease. The p.Asp596 residue is conserved across most mammals, but not across lower organisms. Computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. An in silico analysis study by Lee (2008) classified this variant as low-frequency unclassified variant with medium to high risk in selected computational predictive programs; however, a population study by Pal (2005) noted that a tumour with the variant had low malignant potential. This variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs56328701) “With untested allele”, HGMD, ClinVar database, the BIC database (50X with no clinical importance), and UMD (44X as a neutral variant). In UMD the c.1786G>C variant was identified with five different co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants, increasing the likelihood that the p.Asp596His variant does not have clinical significance. In addition, the variant was classified as a benign by the Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) (submitted within the ClinVar database and derived from Myriad reports). In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.27
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.19
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.050
CADD
Benign
23
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0
.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.33
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.24
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.84
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.0
.;.
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.10
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.14
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.0
.;.
PhyloP100
0.85
PrimateAI
Benign
0.33
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.6
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.22
Sift
Uncertain
0.0020
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.019
D;D
Vest4
0.43
ClinPred
0.14
T
GERP RS
3.4
gMVP
0.25
Mutation Taster
=86/14
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56328701; hg19: chr13-32907401; API