13-32333266-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.1788T>C​(p.Asp596=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00137 in 1,608,580 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 20 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0072 ( 11 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00076 ( 9 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:26

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.698
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).
BP6
Variant 13-32333266-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32333266-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 51193.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32333266-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-32333266-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.698 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00716 (1090/152208) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0244 (1014/41530). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0232. There are 11 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 486 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 11 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1788T>C p.Asp596= synonymous_variant 10/27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1788T>C p.Asp596= synonymous_variant 10/275 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00718
AC:
1092
AN:
152090
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0245
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00268
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00518
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00527
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00203
AC:
499
AN:
245540
Hom.:
5
AF XY:
0.00150
AC XY:
199
AN XY:
132948
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0236
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00197
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00449
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000896
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00101
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000761
AC:
1108
AN:
1456372
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000657
AC XY:
476
AN XY:
724430
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0221
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00204
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00508
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000118
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000423
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00178
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00716
AC:
1090
AN:
152208
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00653
AC XY:
486
AN XY:
74418
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0244
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00268
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00518
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00522
Alfa
AF:
0.00257
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00804
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:26
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:6
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Jan 12, 2015Class 1 not pathogenic based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.01829 (African), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30). -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)Nov 13, 1997- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyCounsylJan 09, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 31, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtJul 28, 2017- -
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesFeb 13, 2017- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Aug 06, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJun 17, 2020- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Mar 28, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 01, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 06, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Jul 12, 2017- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchGenetics Program, Instituto Nacional de CancerNov 01, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 08, 2014- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 21, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicNov 20, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioJul 15, 2016- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 31, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The p.Asp596Asp variant has been identified in 5 individuals from our laboratory, and 13 times in the UMD-BRCA2 database. It is reported in the literature in 28 of 8092 (frequency of 0.003) probands with breast and ovarian cancers; although no control chromosomes were tested to establish the variants frequency in the general population (Borg 2010, Thomassen 2011, Caux-Moncoutier 2011, Fackenthal 2011). The p.Asp596Asp variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located near a splice junction, and is listed in dbSNP database as coming from a "clinical source" (ID#: rs11571642) with an average heterozygosity of 0.013+/-0.079 increasing the likelihood that this is a low frequency benign variant. This variant listed in one proband in our laboratory and one from the UMD database, both of which carried a second pathogenic mutation and breast or ovarian cancer phenotype, increasing the likelihood this variant does not have clinical significance. In addition, Myriad genetics has reported this variant as a polymorphism increasing the likelihood this variant is benign (personal communication). In summary, based on the above information, this variant is classified as benign. -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsFeb 23, 2017- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.59
CADD
Benign
6.4
DANN
Benign
0.55

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11571642; hg19: chr13-32907403; API