Menu
GeneBe

13-32338072-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.3717A>G(p.Lys1239=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000013 in 1,459,322 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000013 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.230
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 13-32338072-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32338072-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 385774.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.23 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3717A>G p.Lys1239= synonymous_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.3717A>G p.Lys1239= synonymous_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
33
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00000804
AC:
2
AN:
248910
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00000743
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
134502
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000177
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000130
AC:
19
AN:
1459322
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.0000179
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
725688
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000117
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000162
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
33
Alfa
AF:
0.0000282
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00000378

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The p.Lys1239Lys variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. This variant was not identified in the literature, but was identified 1X in the UMD as an unclassified variant, and dbSNP (ID: rs141196976) “With allele of Uncertain significance”. The variant was identified in one of 8598 European American alleles (frequency: 0.0001) in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (Exome Variant Server), although this low number of observations and low frequency is not substantive enough to determine the prevalence of the variant in the general population and its relationship to disease. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as predicted benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 19, 2019This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 20104584) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoNov 13, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesApr 02, 2022- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthOct 23, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMay 15, 2018- -
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Jun 29, 2017Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to result in a splicing aberration (Splicing prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/). -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 09, 2015This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMay 29, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Feb 17, 2022- -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 21, 2019- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeDec 30, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
Cadd
Benign
2.0
Dann
Benign
0.59

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141196976; hg19: chr13-32912209; API