13-32338157-T-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.3802T>A(p.Ser1268Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000485 in 1,442,458 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S1268S) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.3802T>A | p.Ser1268Thr | missense_variant | 11/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.3802T>A | p.Ser1268Thr | missense_variant | 11/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000127 AC: 3AN: 235424Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000157 AC XY: 2AN XY: 127386
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000485 AC: 7AN: 1442458Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000698 AC XY: 5AN XY: 716590
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington | Mar 23, 2023 | Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 05, 2023 | This missense variant replaces serine with threonine at codon 1268 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with BRCA2-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 3/235424 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Mar 12, 2021 | In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA2 protein function. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with BRCA2-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 491261). This variant is present in population databases (rs751092504, ExAC 0.02%). This sequence change replaces serine with threonine at codon 1268 of the BRCA2 protein (p.Ser1268Thr). The serine residue is moderately conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between serine and threonine. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at