13-32338598-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4BP6
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.4243G>C(p.Glu1415Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E1415G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- Fanconi anemia complementation group D1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
- pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- sarcomaInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Fanconi anemiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- medulloblastomaInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000059.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | MANE Select | c.4243G>C | p.Glu1415Gln | missense | Exon 11 of 27 | NP_000050.3 | ||
| BRCA2 | NM_001432077.1 | c.4243G>C | p.Glu1415Gln | missense | Exon 11 of 27 | NP_001419006.1 | |||
| BRCA2 | NM_001406720.1 | c.4243G>C | p.Glu1415Gln | missense | Exon 11 of 27 | NP_001393649.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.4243G>C | p.Glu1415Gln | missense | Exon 11 of 27 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
| BRCA2 | ENST00000544455.6 | TSL:1 | c.4243G>C | p.Glu1415Gln | missense | Exon 11 of 27 | ENSP00000439902.1 | ||
| BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | TSL:1 | c.3874G>C | p.Glu1292Gln | missense | Exon 11 of 27 | ENSP00000499438.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 35
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
The p.E1415Q variant (also known as c.4243G>C), located in coding exon 10 of the BRCA2 gene, results from a G to C substitution at nucleotide position 4243. The glutamic acid at codon 1415 is replaced by glutamine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This variant was identified in 2 of 1444 individuals with a personal and/or family history suggestive of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (Boga I et al. Eur J Breast Health, 2023 Jul;19:235-252). This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear.
Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673).
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant summary: BRCA2 c.4243G>C (p.Glu1415Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 242558 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.4243G>C has been reported in the literature in one individual affected with breast cancer in a cohort of cases selected independent of family history, only BRCA1 and 2 were analyzed (example, Bisgin_2018). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. One clinical diagnostic laboratory has submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance.
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 1415 of the BRCA2 protein (p.Glu1415Gln). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 31228304). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 1052936). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA2 protein function with a negative predictive value of 95%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at