13-32338633-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):āc.4278A>Gā(p.Thr1426=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000691 in 1,446,460 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T1426T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.4278A>G | p.Thr1426= | synonymous_variant | 11/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.4278A>G | p.Thr1426= | synonymous_variant | 11/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.91e-7 AC: 1AN: 1446460Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00000140 AC XY: 1AN XY: 716646
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jan 10, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 24, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA2 p.Thr1426= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the dbSNP, GeneInsight-COGR, Clinvitae, Cosmic, LOVD 3.0, UMD-LSDB, BIC Database, ARUP Laboratories, or Zhejiang University databases. The variant was only identified in ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Color Genomics) database. The variant was not identified in the following control databases: the 1000 Genomes Project, the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project, the Exome Aggregation Consortium (August 8th 2016), or the Genome Aggregation Database (Feb 27, 2017). The p.Thr1426= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 13, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at