13-32338939-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.4584C>T(p.Ser1528Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000131 in 1,613,660 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00026 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA2
NM_000059.4 synonymous
NM_000059.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.846
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).
BP6
Variant 13-32338939-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32338939-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 51677.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32338939-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-32338939-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.846 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.4584C>T | p.Ser1528Ser | synonymous_variant | 11/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.4584C>T | p.Ser1528Ser | synonymous_variant | 11/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.4215C>T | p.Ser1405Ser | synonymous_variant | 11/27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.4584C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 10/26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000263 AC: 40AN: 151982Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
40
AN:
151982
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000224 AC: 56AN: 250280Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000184 AC XY: 25AN XY: 135572
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
56
AN:
250280
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
25
AN XY:
135572
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000118 AC: 172AN: 1461560Hom.: 0 Cov.: 45 AF XY: 0.000116 AC XY: 84AN XY: 727062
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
172
AN:
1461560
Hom.:
Cov.:
45
AF XY:
AC XY:
84
AN XY:
727062
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000263 AC: 40AN: 152100Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000336 AC XY: 25AN XY: 74346
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
40
AN:
152100
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
25
AN XY:
74346
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:26
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:7
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | Jun 12, 2000 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | May 21, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Counsyl | May 27, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Jun 29, 2017 | Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to result in a splicing aberration (Splicing prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/). - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Sep 21, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Jul 28, 2017 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 09, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 23, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 01, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2024 | BRCA2: BP4 - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Nov 13, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Jun 18, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 14, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 21, 2015 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 20, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jun 06, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 14, 2015 | Variant summary: The c.4584C>T variant, a synonymous mutation, lies in the middle of exon 11. This variant involves a non-conserved nucleotide and 5/5 in silico splice-site prediction tools via Alamut predict that the variant does not affect normal splicing. This prediction is consistent with the report from Caux-Moncoutier et al (Caux-Moncoutier et al 2009) in which the authors 'indirectly' show that the variant of interest does not result in allelic imbalance due to nonsense mediated decay of aberrant splice products. The variant was found in the general population at a frequency of 0.02% which does not exceed the maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BRCA2 variant (which is 0.075%). However, the frequency of this variant in the Latino population is just above that of the maximal expected allele frequency (0.78%), which suggests this variant to be a polymorphism found mainly in populations of Latin descent. Indeed, several of the reported HBOC patients/families with the variant were from Spain, and co-occurrence and co-segregation were not reported for these patients, suggesting the true disease-causing mutation was not detected/presented. Furthermore, UMD reports co-occurrence with a possibly deleterious truncating BRCA2 variants c.6079dup (p.Arg2027LysfsX22) and c.4926_4935del (p.Asn1642LysfsX25) and with BRCA1 variant c.3331_3334delCAAG (p.Gln1111AsnfsX5) implicating that the variant of interest is in the benign spectrum. Additionally, publications (Osorio_BRCA2_Clin Genet_1998; Diez_BRCA2_HM_2003) and several clinical diagnostic laboratoris classify variant as Polymorphism/Bening/Likely Bening (without evidence to independently evaluate). Considering all evidence, the variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Jan 04, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Nov 22, 2022 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA2 p.Ser1528Ser variant was identified in 25 of 1248 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.04) from Spanish families with breast and ovarian cancer, and was not identified in 200 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Diez 2003).The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80359788) “With Uncertain significance allele”, with a minor allele frequency of 0.001 (1000 Genomes Project), NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (Exome Variant Server), LOVD, the ClinVar database (with one “uncertain significance” classification from BIC, benign submission from Invitae and benign submission from GeneDX), the BIC database (2X with unknown clinical importance), and UMD (21X as a neutral variant). In addition, Myriad classifies this as a polymorphism (personal communication). In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants (c.3331_3334delCAAG (p.Gln1111AsnfsX5) of BRCA1gene and c.4926_4935del (p.Asn1642LysfsX25) of BRCA2 gene), increasing the likelihood that the p.Ser1528Ser variant does not have clinical significance. This variant was identified in the 1000 Genomes Project in 2 of 2000 chromosomes (frequency: 0.001), Exome Variant Server project in 3 of 4406 African American alleles, increasing the likelihood that this is/may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. The p.Ser1528Ser variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site.The p.Ser1528Ser variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs(SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Feb 23, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at