13-32338939-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.4584C>T​(p.Ser1528Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000131 in 1,613,660 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00026 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:27

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.846

Publications

12 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
BRCA2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • Fanconi anemia complementation group D1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
  • pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • medulloblastoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).
BP6
Variant 13-32338939-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32338939-C-T is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 51677.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.846 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkc.4584C>T p.Ser1528Ser synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3 P51587

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkc.4584C>T p.Ser1528Ser synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 27 5 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3 P51587
BRCA2ENST00000530893.7 linkc.4215C>T p.Ser1405Ser synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 27 1 ENSP00000499438.2 A0A590UJI7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkn.4584C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 26 2 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000263
AC:
40
AN:
151982
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000774
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000197
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000736
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000224
AC:
56
AN:
250280
AF XY:
0.000184
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000690
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000754
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000996
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000124
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000329
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000118
AC:
172
AN:
1461560
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
45
AF XY:
0.000116
AC XY:
84
AN XY:
727062
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00114
AC:
38
AN:
33448
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000716
AC:
32
AN:
44680
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26122
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39688
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000580
AC:
5
AN:
86208
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53380
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000347
AC:
2
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000666
AC:
74
AN:
1111886
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000331
AC:
20
AN:
60382
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.478
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
10
20
31
41
51
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000263
AC:
40
AN:
152100
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000336
AC XY:
25
AN XY:
74346
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000771
AC:
32
AN:
41490
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000196
AC:
3
AN:
15272
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4810
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10580
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000736
AC:
5
AN:
67972
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.514
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
6
10
13
16
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000384
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000408
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:27
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:7
May 27, 2014
Counsyl
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Jul 28, 2017
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 12, 2000
Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 29, 2017
Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to result in a splicing aberration (Splicing prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/). -

May 21, 2017
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:5
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 09, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BRCA2: BP4 -

Oct 23, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Nov 13, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Aug 14, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Sep 05, 2024
Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BS1, BP1_Strong c.4584C>T, located in exon 11 of the BRCA2 gene, is predicted to result in no amino acid change, p.(Ser1528=). This position is outside a (potentially) clinically important functional domain and, moreover, the SpliceAI algorithm predicts no significant impact on splicing (BP1_strong). The variant allele was found in 21/23322 alleles, with a filter allele frequency of 0.05% at 99% confidence, within the African population in the gnomAD v2.1.1 database (non-cancer data set) (BS1). To our knowledge, neither relevant clinical data nor well-stablished functional studies have been reported for this variant. In addition, the variant was also identified in the following databases: BRCA Exchange (Likely benign: Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to result in a splicing aberration), ClinVar (7x benign, 18x likely benign, 2x uncertain significance) and LOVD (4x benign, 4x likely benign, 8x uncertain significance). Based on the currently available information, c.4584C>T is classified as a benign variant according to ClinGen-BRCA2 Guidelines version v1.0.0. -

Apr 21, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 18, 2018
True Health Diagnostics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
Dec 20, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jun 06, 2019
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:3
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 04, 2024
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 14, 2015
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The c.4584C>T variant, a synonymous mutation, lies in the middle of exon 11. This variant involves a non-conserved nucleotide and 5/5 in silico splice-site prediction tools via Alamut predict that the variant does not affect normal splicing. This prediction is consistent with the report from Caux-Moncoutier et al (Caux-Moncoutier et al 2009) in which the authors 'indirectly' show that the variant of interest does not result in allelic imbalance due to nonsense mediated decay of aberrant splice products. The variant was found in the general population at a frequency of 0.02% which does not exceed the maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BRCA2 variant (which is 0.075%). However, the frequency of this variant in the Latino population is just above that of the maximal expected allele frequency (0.78%), which suggests this variant to be a polymorphism found mainly in populations of Latin descent. Indeed, several of the reported HBOC patients/families with the variant were from Spain, and co-occurrence and co-segregation were not reported for these patients, suggesting the true disease-causing mutation was not detected/presented. Furthermore, UMD reports co-occurrence with a possibly deleterious truncating BRCA2 variants c.6079dup (p.Arg2027LysfsX22) and c.4926_4935del (p.Asn1642LysfsX25) and with BRCA1 variant c.3331_3334delCAAG (p.Gln1111AsnfsX5) implicating that the variant of interest is in the benign spectrum. Additionally, publications (Osorio_BRCA2_Clin Genet_1998; Diez_BRCA2_HM_2003) and several clinical diagnostic laboratoris classify variant as Polymorphism/Bening/Likely Bening (without evidence to independently evaluate). Considering all evidence, the variant is classified as benign. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Nov 22, 2022
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRCA2 p.Ser1528Ser variant was identified in 25 of 1248 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.04) from Spanish families with breast and ovarian cancer, and was not identified in 200 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Diez 2003).The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80359788) “With Uncertain significance allele”, with a minor allele frequency of 0.001 (1000 Genomes Project), NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (Exome Variant Server), LOVD, the ClinVar database (with one “uncertain significance” classification from BIC, benign submission from Invitae and benign submission from GeneDX), the BIC database (2X with unknown clinical importance), and UMD (21X as a neutral variant). In addition, Myriad classifies this as a polymorphism (personal communication). In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants (c.3331_3334delCAAG (p.Gln1111AsnfsX5) of BRCA1gene and c.4926_4935del (p.Asn1642LysfsX25) of BRCA2 gene), increasing the likelihood that the p.Ser1528Ser variant does not have clinical significance. This variant was identified in the 1000 Genomes Project in 2 of 2000 chromosomes (frequency: 0.001), Exome Variant Server project in 3 of 4406 African American alleles, increasing the likelihood that this is/may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. The p.Ser1528Ser variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site.The p.Ser1528Ser variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs(SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Feb 23, 2017
Baylor Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.42
CADD
Benign
9.0
DANN
Benign
0.55
PhyloP100
0.85
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80359788; hg19: chr13-32913076; API