13-32338969-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.4614T>C(p.Ser1538=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000166 in 1,613,780 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000099 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00017 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA2
NM_000059.4 synonymous
NM_000059.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.10
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).
BP6
Variant 13-32338969-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32338969-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 51683.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32338969-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.1 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.4614T>C | p.Ser1538= | synonymous_variant | 11/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.4614T>C | p.Ser1538= | synonymous_variant | 11/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000986 AC: 15AN: 152150Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
152150
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000958 AC: 24AN: 250406Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000103 AC XY: 14AN XY: 135602
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
24
AN:
250406
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
135602
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000173 AC: 253AN: 1461512Hom.: 0 Cov.: 45 AF XY: 0.000177 AC XY: 129AN XY: 727064
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
253
AN:
1461512
Hom.:
Cov.:
45
AF XY:
AC XY:
129
AN XY:
727064
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000985 AC: 15AN: 152268Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000940 AC XY: 7AN XY: 74466
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
152268
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
74466
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:19
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jun 23, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 13, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 09, 2017 | - - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:2Benign:3
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | Jan 18, 2007 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Jan 11, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center | Feb 14, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Jun 29, 2017 | Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to result in a splicing aberration (Splicing prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/). - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Counsyl | Jan 22, 2015 | - - |
not specified Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 05, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 11, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 05, 2018 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency | Apr 14, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Mar 19, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Nov 30, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 24, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | May 19, 2021 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Feb 23, 2021 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The p.Ser1538Ser variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located near a splice junction. It has been reported in the literature in 3/7256 proband chromosomes of individuals with breast cancer; however, no control chromosomes were tested to establish the frequency of the variant in the general population (Borg 2010, Caux-Moncoutier 2011). It is listed in the dbSNP database as coming from a "clinical source" (ID#: rs45520945) with a global minor allele frequency (MAF) of 0.001, increasing the likelihood that this is a low frequency benign variant. The variant was also identified in the UMD (x6), BIC (x1), Exome Server and the BOCs databases. In the UMD database, this variant was identified in one individual with a second pathogenic variant in the BRCA2 gene, c.1327G>T (p.Glu443X), increasing the likelihood that the p.Ser1538Ser variant is a benign alteration. In summary, based on the above information, we cannot determine the clinical significance of this variant is classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at