13-32339425-A-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.5070A>C(p.Lys1690Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000192 in 1,593,180 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00022 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00019 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
8
8
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.17
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.20955938).
BP6
Variant 13-32339425-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32339425-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 37942.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32339425-A-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-32339425-A-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.5070A>C | p.Lys1690Asn | missense_variant | 11/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.5070A>C | p.Lys1690Asn | missense_variant | 11/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000223 AC: 34AN: 152186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
34
AN:
152186
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000221 AC: 52AN: 235076Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000251 AC XY: 32AN XY: 127476
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
52
AN:
235076
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
32
AN XY:
127476
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000189 AC: 272AN: 1440994Hom.: 0 Cov.: 46 AF XY: 0.000225 AC XY: 161AN XY: 714624
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
272
AN:
1440994
Hom.:
Cov.:
46
AF XY:
AC XY:
161
AN XY:
714624
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000223 AC: 34AN: 152186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000134 AC XY: 10AN XY: 74350
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
34
AN:
152186
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
74350
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
AC:
26
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:25
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | BRCAlab, Lund University | Mar 02, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan | Nov 03, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Jul 28, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | May 31, 2017 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Aug 10, 2015 | IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.0000000459 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Counsyl | Mar 07, 2014 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency | Apr 18, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jun 02, 2023 | The p.Lys1690Asn variant in BRCA2 is classified as likely benign because it has been identified in 0.29% (10/3466) of Ashkenazi Jewish chromosomes and 0.031% (21/68012) of European chromosomes by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BS1_Supporting - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jan 03, 2022 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Mar 26, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 07, 2016 | Variant Summary: The c.5070A>C variant involves a conserved nucleotide in which 4/5 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome, and has a low prevalence in European controls (EVS: 2/8576 chrs and ExAC: 25/72,294 chrs). Though the observed allele frequency in general population is not higher than the maximal expected allele frequency for a BRCA2 pathogenic variant (1/1333) the presence of this variant in controls indicates that this variant might be a rare polymorphism. More importantly, the variant has been reported to co-occur with other deleterious variants in BRCA2 and BRCA1 (4 independent individuals who carry pathogenic variants in each BRCA1 and BRCA2, reported in UMD and BIC), strong evidence that this variantis benign. In addition, it has also been classified as benign by multiple reputable databases and clinical labs, databases and publications (Easton_2007, Lindor_2012 and Whiley_2014). There are no functional studies reported for the variant to date. Multifactorial probability based model also shows the variant to be benign. Taken together, this variant has been classified as Benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 09, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21952622, 21702907, 11304778, 25948282, 22366370, 28324225, 21990134, 17924331, 17997147, 15172753, 18951446, 24212087, 24323938, 22811390, 12161607, 24489791, 26689913, 19912264, 24504028, 27930734, 18256760, 32444794) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Dec 01, 2023 | BRCA2: BP1 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Oct 16, 2017 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 23, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Department of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet | Feb 02, 2024 | The following ACMG criteria is used: BS1 (FAF > 0.01% in gnomAD), BP1_Strong (SpliceAI: less than or equal to 0.1) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 19, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | May 07, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Apr 17, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Chordoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Integrative Tumor Epidemiology Branch, National Institutes of Health | Mar 22, 2021 | No impact on ES cell survival or drug sensitivity (no impact on BRCA2 function) - |
Medulloblastoma;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C1838457:Fanconi anemia complementation group D1;C2675520:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2;C2751641:Glioma susceptibility 3;C3150546:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Mar 01, 2022 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Dec 20, 2017 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | Not expected to have clinical significance. myriad calls a polymorphism (personal communication). 39X in BIC (unknown clinical importance), 12X in UMD and co-occurred with a second pathogenic variant 5X increasing the likelihood the p.Lys1690Asn variant does not have clinical significance. Lindor_2012, Posterior probability of being deleterious = 1.94x10-7 - iarc working group calls class 1 - not pathogenic. Not well conserved in mammals but in-silico software (AlignGVGD, Polyphen-2, SIFT, BLOSUM) do not agree. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationTaster
Benign
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
T;T
Vest4
MutPred
Loss of ubiquitination at K1690 (P = 0.0224);Loss of ubiquitination at K1690 (P = 0.0224);
MVP
MPC
0.14
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at