13-32339555-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4BP6
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.5200G>A(p.Glu1734Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000756 in 1,455,144 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.5200G>A | p.Glu1734Lys | missense_variant | 11/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.5200G>A | p.Glu1734Lys | missense_variant | 11/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000122 AC: 3AN: 246610Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000749 AC XY: 1AN XY: 133518
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000756 AC: 11AN: 1455144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 46 AF XY: 0.00000967 AC XY: 7AN XY: 723878
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 05, 2023 | The p.E1734K variant (also known as c.5200G>A), located in coding exon 10 of the BRCA2 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 5200. The glutamic acid at codon 1734 is replaced by lysine, an amino acid with similar properties. This alteration has been reported in multiple individuals with personal and/or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancers (Konstantopoulou I et al. Clin. Genet., 2014 Jan;85:36-42; Singh J et al. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 2018 Jul;170:189-196; Momozawa Y et al. Nat Commun, 2018 10;9:4083; Zuntini R et al. Front Genet, 2018 Sep;9:378). This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Sep 09, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington | Mar 23, 2023 | Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jun 11, 2021 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 21, 2021 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.5200G>A (p.Glu1734Lys) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.2e-05 in 246610 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. The variant, c.5200G>A, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast and/or ovarian cancer (Konstantopoulou_2014, Zuntini_2018, Singh_2018, Guo_2020), however it was also reported in several healthy controls (Momozawa_2018, Dorling_2021, Dong_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014, and classified the variant as VUS (n=3), or likely benign (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Apr 22, 2020 | - - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna | Sep 01, 2023 | BP1(Strong) according to ACMG/AMP classification guidelines specified for BRCA1 & BRCA2 (Classification Criteria V1.0.0 2023-09-08 - https://cspec.genome.network/cspec/ui/svi/affiliation/50087) (PMID: 38160042) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | Nov 29, 2022 | The BRCA2 c.5200G>A (p.Glu1734Lys) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.0018% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. This variant has been reported in individuals with a personal and/or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMID: 24010542, 29470806, 30254663), as well as in unaffected individuals (PMID: 30287823, 32467295). This variant is absent in the FLOSSIES database, which contains genetic variants from women older than 70 years of age who have never had cancer (https://whi.color.com/). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with Fanconi anemia. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 20, 2022 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); Also known as 5428G>A; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30254663, 24010542, 24807215, 29470806, 30287823, 31837001, 35159047, 31853058, 29884841, 32377563, 33471991, 32467295, 32980694) - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 06, 2023 | This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 1734 of the BRCA2 protein (p.Glu1734Lys). This variant is present in population databases (rs786202543, gnomAD 0.005%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer and/or ovarian cancer (PMID: 24010542, 29470806, 30254663, 31837001). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 185896). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA2 protein function with a negative predictive value of 95%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at