13-32340092-T-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.5737T>G(p.Cys1913Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000161 in 1,613,826 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. C1913Y) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000016 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.582

Publications

15 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
sarcoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Fanconi anemia
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
medulloblastoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

BRCA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.13126907).

BP6

Variant 13-32340092-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32340092-T-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 96827.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4 link	c.5737T>G	p.Cys1913Gly	missense_variant	Exon 11 of 27	ENST00000380152.8	NP_000050.3	P51587

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8 link	c.5737T>G	p.Cys1913Gly	missense_variant	Exon 11 of 27	5	NM_000059.4	ENSP00000369497.3	P51587
BRCA2	ENST00000530893.7 link	c.5368T>G	p.Cys1790Gly	missense_variant	Exon 11 of 27	1		ENSP00000499438.2	A0A590UJI7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2 link	n.5737T>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 10 of 26	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152212

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000164

AC:

AN:

1461614

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000193

AC XY:

AN XY:

727094

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33474

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44718

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26128

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39666

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86236

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53366

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000216

AC:

AN:

1111878

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60382

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.500

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152212

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

74358

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41468

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15284

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5200

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4834

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

68012

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2090

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.550

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000400

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000756

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Uncertain:2Benign:1

Feb 20, 2004

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 02, 2018

Counsyl

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Dec 06, 2013

Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Mar 23, 2023

University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -

Aug 01, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Oct 06, 2017

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:2

Feb 01, 2024

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Observed in individual(s) with personal and/or family history of ovarian cancer (PMID: 36169650); Also known as 5965T>G; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29884841, 23231788, 16683254, 30287823, 30212499, 32377563, 31176623, 36169650, 36243179) -

Nov 30, 2022

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000032 (1/31406 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. In the published literature, the variant has been reported in unaffected control individuals (PMID: 30287823 (2018)). In a large scale breast cancer association study, this variant was observed in individuals with breast cancer as well as unaffected study controls (PMID: 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/BRCA2)). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Additional analysis using software algorithms for the prediction of the effect of nucleotide changes on BRCA2 mRNA splicing yielded predictions that this variant may result in the gain of a cryptic splice site without affecting the natural splice sites . Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Jun 27, 2022

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.5737T>G (p.Cys1913Gly) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the BRCA2 repeat region (IPR002093) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 3.6e-06 in 275934 control chromosomes (gnomAD and Momozawa 2018). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.5737T>G in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (likely benign, n=3; VUS, n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Uncertain:1

Feb 15, 2022

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast;C2675520:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Uncertain:1

Oct 05, 2022

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.075

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.099

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.38

CADD

Benign

0.051

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.47

Eigen

Benign

-1.6

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.7

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.015

M_CAP

Benign

0.029

MetaRNN

Benign

0.13

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.99

PhyloP100

-0.58

PrimateAI

Benign

0.22

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-4.0

D;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.31

Sift

Benign

0.33

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.33

T;T

Vest4

0.24

MutPred

0.45

Loss of stability (P = 0.0063);Loss of stability (P = 0.0063);

MVP

0.68

MPC

0.022

ClinPred

0.36

GERP RS

-11

gMVP

0.12

Mutation Taster

=59/41

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over