13-32340486-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.6131G>C​(p.Gly2044Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000143 in 1,613,582 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G2044V) has been classified as Benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000014 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0170
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.072500825).
BP6
Variant 13-32340486-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32340486-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 38020.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=8, Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=2}. Variant chr13-32340486-G-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.6131G>C p.Gly2044Ala missense_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3 P51587

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.6131G>C p.Gly2044Ala missense_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3 P51587
BRCA2ENST00000530893.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.5762G>C p.Gly1921Ala missense_variant 11/271 ENSP00000499438.2 A0A590UJI7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.6131G>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 10/262 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152096
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000479
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000239
AC:
6
AN:
250934
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000221
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135648
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000616
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000992
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000144
AC:
21
AN:
1461368
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
45
AF XY:
0.0000124
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
726970
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000144
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152214
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74418
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000474
Alfa
AF:
0.00000577
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00000378
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.0000247
AC:
3
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoAug 02, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJan 20, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 06, 2020This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22713736, 19619314, 16949048, 12955716, 29061375, 14517958, 12624724) -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMay 11, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsAug 15, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Nov 11, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationUniversity of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of WashingtonMar 23, 2023Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Apr 22, 2010- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)Feb 20, 2004- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthDec 18, 2023- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioDec 11, 2015- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsMay 05, 2020This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpNov 24, 2023Variant summary: BRCA2 c.6131G>C (p.Gly2044Ala) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 3.1e-05 in 358056 control chromosomes (gnomAD, Diez_2003, Dorling_2021). This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (3.1e-05 vs 0.00075), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.6131G>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast and/or ovarian cancer without strong evidence of causality (Diez_2003, Martinez-Ferrandis_2003, Palomba_2009, Jalkh_2012, Santonocito_2020, Foglietta_2020, Patruno_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variants have been reported (BRCA2 c.5984dup, p.Asn1995LysfsX8; BRCA2 c.5980C>T, p.Gln1994Ter), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 22713736, 12955716, 19619314, 14517958, 32438681, 33471991, 32806537, 34572941). Ten submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014, and classified it as benign (n=2), likely benign (n=6), or uncertain significance (n=2). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA2 p.Gly2044Ala variant was identified in 5 of 2336 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.003) from Spanish, Lebanese and Sardinian (Italian) individuals or families with sporadic breast cancer, early onset breast cancer and/or HBOC and was not identified in 606 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Palomba 2009 , Martinez-Ferrandis 2003, Jalkh 2012, Diez 2003). In 1 proband, the variant was found to co-occur with a truncating BRCA2 mutation (p.Q1994X) and hence determined to be a rare polymorphism because it altered a non-conservative residue and was absent in controls (Martinez-Ferrandis 2003). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs56191579) “With other allele”, ClinVar (with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity: classified benign by Ambry Genetics and SCRP (Sharing Clinical Reports Project); likely benign by GeneDx and Invitae; and uncertain significance by CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Lab, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano and BIC), Clinvitae (4X), UMD-LSDB (3x as 3-UV), and BIC Database (3x clinical importance unknown, classification pending). The variant was not identified in COGR, Cosmic, ARUP Laboratories, and Zhejiang Colon Cancer Databases. The variant was also identified by our laboratory in 1 individual with breast cancer and in control databases in 6 of 245748 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00002 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 1 of 15274 chromosomes (freq: 0.00007), Other in 1 of 5472 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 1 of 33566 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), European Non-Finnish in 3 of 111442 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), and not in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.Gly2044 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 11, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.093
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.31
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
CADD
Benign
0.30
DANN
Benign
0.62
Eigen
Benign
-1.5
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.6
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.063
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.015
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.073
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.90
T
PrimateAI
Benign
0.20
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.5
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.17
Sift
Benign
0.073
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.61
T;T
Vest4
0.28
MVP
0.75
MPC
0.021
ClinPred
0.052
T
GERP RS
-4.2
gMVP
0.12

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56191579; hg19: chr13-32914623; API