13-32340486-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.6131G>T​(p.Gly2044Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000141 in 1,613,582 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G2044A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

2
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0170
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.02212581).
BP6
Variant 13-32340486-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32340486-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 38021.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=8, Benign=5, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr13-32340486-G-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkc.6131G>T p.Gly2044Val missense_variant Exon 11 of 27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3 P51587

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkc.6131G>T p.Gly2044Val missense_variant Exon 11 of 27 5 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3 P51587
BRCA2ENST00000530893.7 linkc.5762G>T p.Gly1921Val missense_variant Exon 11 of 27 1 ENSP00000499438.2 A0A590UJI7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkn.6131G>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 26 2 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000723
AC:
11
AN:
152096
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00211
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000399
AC:
10
AN:
250934
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000295
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
135648
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000489
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000881
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000148
AC:
217
AN:
1461368
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
45
AF XY:
0.000124
AC XY:
90
AN XY:
726970
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00532
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000180
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000663
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000723
AC:
11
AN:
152214
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000806
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74418
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00212
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000289
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000151
ExAC
AF:
0.0000412
AC:
5
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:4
Apr 28, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

May 29, 2002
Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 02, 2011
Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 10, 2014
Counsyl
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: literature only

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Nov 19, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Apr 25, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 23, 2023
University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -

not specified Benign:2
Dec 20, 2016
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 18, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.6131G>T (p.Gly2044Val) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.4e-05 in 251324 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This frequency is not higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (4.4e-05 vs 0.00075), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. The variant, c.6131G>T, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, predominantly Japanese and Korean ethnicities, along with the variant co-occurring with different pathogenic variants (Silva_2015; Ohmoto_2018; BIC database; internal database), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Four ClinVar submissions from other clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

not provided Benign:2
Oct 27, 2020
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26332594, 15168169, 29192238, 17100994, 21218378, 19016756, 16949048, 24884479, 12624724, 25802882, 18779604, 26315209, 27383479, 27124784, 28111427, 23555315, 24843434, 30415210, 29802286, 31131967, 32486089) -

Jul 16, 2019
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast neoplasm Uncertain:1
-
A.C.Camargo Cancer Center / LGBM, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Jul 18, 2022
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Apr 28, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

The BRCA2 p.Gly2044Val variant was identified in 15 of 5097 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.003) from Korean, Japanese, Brazilian and Hawaiian individuals or families with with breast or ovarian cancer or a family history of breast and ovarian cancers, and was present in 1 of 724 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Carney 2010, Han S-H 2006, Hirotsu 2014, Jalkh 2012, Kawahara 2004 , Kim 2006, Silva 2014, Sugano 2008). The variant was found to cooccur with a pathogenic BRCA1 variant (c.3759G>T p.E1214X) in 1 affected Brazilian proband (Silva 2014). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs56191579) “With other allele”, ClinVar (with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity; submitters: benign by Ambry Genetics and Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP); likely benign by Counsyl, GeneDx, Invitae and Genetic Services Laboratory (University of Chicago); uncertain significance by BIC and Laboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biology (A.C.Camargo Cancer Center)), Clinvitae (5x), BIC Database (10x with clinical importance unknown, classification pending), and in control databases in 10 of 245748 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00004 increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017), being identified in the following populations: European Non-Finnish in 1 of 111442 chromosomes (frequency: 0.000009) and East Asian in 9 of 17242 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0005). The variant was not identified in Genesight-COGR, Cosmic, LOVD 3.0, ARUP Laboratories, and Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The p.Gly2044 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.092
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.18
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.16
CADD
Benign
2.0
DANN
Benign
0.66
Eigen
Benign
-1.4
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.5
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.13
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.020
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.022
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.95
T
PrimateAI
Benign
0.20
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.9
D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.25
Sift
Uncertain
0.011
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.23
T;T
Vest4
0.73
MVP
0.76
MPC
0.036
ClinPred
0.11
T
GERP RS
-4.2
gMVP
0.20

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56191579; hg19: chr13-32914623; API