Menu
GeneBe

13-32340767-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.6412G>T​(p.Val2138Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000605 in 1,597,802 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V2138D) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0032 ( 4 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00034 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:26O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.240
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0071460307).
BP6
Variant 13-32340767-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32340767-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 52087.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=12, Likely_benign=7, Uncertain_significance=1, not_provided=1}. Variant chr13-32340767-G-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-32340767-G-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00315 (480/152316) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0111 (463/41582). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0103. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 224 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.6412G>T p.Val2138Phe missense_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.6412G>T p.Val2138Phe missense_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00312
AC:
475
AN:
152198
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000720
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000728
AC:
171
AN:
234900
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.000416
AC XY:
53
AN XY:
127374
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0102
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000362
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000372
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000918
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000178
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000337
AC:
487
AN:
1445486
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
47
AF XY:
0.000281
AC XY:
202
AN XY:
718868
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0117
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000349
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000253
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000967
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000632
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00129
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00315
AC:
480
AN:
152316
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00301
AC XY:
224
AN XY:
74490
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0111
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000719
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00237
Alfa
AF:
0.000414
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00351
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00954
AC:
42
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000799
AC:
97
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00260
AC:
9
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:26Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMichigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of MichiganApr 21, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)May 29, 2002- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)May 01, 2012- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaSep 27, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyCounsylJan 21, 2014- -
not specified Benign:5Other:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The p.Val2138Phe variant has been identified in 4 out of 4579 proband chromosomes (frequency 0.001) in individuals with unilateral, contralateral and familial breast cancer phenotype, and also found in 1 out of 190 control chromosomes (frequency 0.005) included in these studies (Wagner 1999, Capanu 2011, Thesis (South African)). It is listed in dbSNP database coming from a “clinical source” (ID#: rs11571659) with a “global minor allele frequency of 0.001 (1000 genomes), therefore increasing the likelihood that this variant is benign. This residue is not highly conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen, SIFT, AlignGVGD) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. In the UMD database, this variant has been identified in 1 (out of 5) individuals with breast or ovarian cancers, where a second pathogenic BRCA1 mutation was also detected, further suggesting that this is a benign variant. In addition, Myriad genetics has reported this variant as a polymorphism increasing the likelihood this variant is benign (personal communication). In summary, based on above information this variant is classified as Benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoDec 08, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMar 20, 2017- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Aug 04, 2014- -
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 29, 2023- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicFeb 01, 2018- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Apr 26, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 10, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationUniversity of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of WashingtonMar 23, 2023Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchGenetics Program, Instituto Nacional de CancerNov 01, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpSep 29, 2014- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
Breast neoplasm Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchA.C.Camargo Cancer Center / LGBM, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center-- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioMay 04, 2022- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaSep 27, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.075
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.51
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
CADD
Benign
3.9
DANN
Benign
0.93
Eigen
Benign
-1.4
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.5
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.093
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.074
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0071
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.93
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.20
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.71
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.20
Sift
Benign
0.032
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.10
T;T
Vest4
0.23
MVP
0.81
MPC
0.035
ClinPred
0.0057
T
GERP RS
-4.6
gMVP
0.17

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11571659; hg19: chr13-32914904; COSMIC: COSV66453045; API