13-32341127-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.6772G>A(p.Glu2258Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000744 in 1,613,742 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.6772G>A | p.Glu2258Lys | missense_variant | 11/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.6772G>A | p.Glu2258Lys | missense_variant | 11/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152128Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000796 AC: 2AN: 251190Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135842
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000616 AC: 9AN: 1461614Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00000550 AC XY: 4AN XY: 727120
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152128Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74320
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 15, 2016 | Variant summary: The BRCA2 c.6772G>A (p.Glu2258Lys) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 4/5 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Glu2258 is not conserved across species and is not located in a known functional domain. This variant was found in 1/120952 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0000083, which does not exceed the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BRCA2 variant (0.0007503). The variant was identified as a de novo occurrence in one patients with ASD, but it is unknown if this family had a history of cancer. In addition, one clinical diagnostic laboratory classified this variant as uncertain significance. Taken together, this variant is classified as VUS until additional information is available. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 29, 2015 | This variant is denoted BRCA2 c.6772G>A at the cDNA level, p.Glu2258Lys (E2258K) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Glutamic Acid to a Lysine (GAA>AAA). Using alternate nomenclature, this variant would be defined as BRCA2 7000G>A. While this variant was identified as a de novo finding in a child with an autism spectrum disorder, it has not, to our knowledge, been reported in an individual noted to have a personal or family history of cancer (Neale 2012). BRCA2 Glu2258Lys was not observed in approximately 6,500 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, indicating it is not a common benign variant in these populations. Since Glutamic Acid and Lysine differ in polarity, charge, size or other properties, this is considered a non-conservative amino acid substitution. BRCA2 Glu2258Lys occurs at a position that is not conserved and is not located in a known functional domain (Borg 2010, UniProt). In silico analyses predict that this variant is unlikely to alter protein structure or function. Based on currently available information, it is unclear whether BRCA2 Glu2258Lys is pathogenic or benign. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Feb 26, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2022 | BRCA2: BP1, BP4 - |
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | MGZ Medical Genetics Center | Feb 09, 2024 | ACMG codes applied following ENIGMA VCEP rules: BP1_STR - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Immunology and Genetics Kaiserslautern | Apr 18, 2024 | ACMG Criteria: PM2_P, described BRCA2 coldspot (PMID:31911673); Variant was found in heterozygous state - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington | Mar 23, 2023 | Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 08, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Dec 13, 2023 | This missense variant replaces glutamic acid with lysine at codon 2258 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with BRCA2-related cancers, but it has been reported in unaffected individuals (PMID: 30287823, 31214711, 32980694). This variant has been identified in 3/282564 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 30, 2023 | This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 2258 of the BRCA2 protein (p.Glu2258Lys). This variant is present in population databases (rs730881549, gnomAD 0.003%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with BRCA2-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 182233). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA2 protein function with a negative predictive value of 95%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Feb 06, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at