13-32346877-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):ā€‹c.6988A>Gā€‹(p.Ile2330Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,457,896 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0000014 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:9B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.13
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.03118071).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.6988A>G p.Ile2330Val missense_variant 13/27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3 P51587

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.6988A>G p.Ile2330Val missense_variant 13/275 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3 P51587
BRCA2ENST00000530893.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.6619A>G p.Ile2207Val missense_variant 13/271 ENSP00000499438.2 A0A590UJI7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.6988A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 12/262 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000137
AC:
2
AN:
1457896
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.00000276
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
725284
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
9.01e-7
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:9Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthDec 13, 2023This missense variant replaces isoleucine with valine at codon 2330 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in individuals with a personal or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer or prostate cancer (PMID: 27741520, 29161300, 29659569, 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_001102, 35264596, 35980532, 36329109, 36977404). This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 28, 2023Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with breast or prostate cancer (Fernandes et al., 2016; Paulo et al., 2018; Ren et al., 2021; Guindalini et al., 2022; Matta et al., 2022); Also known as 7216A>G; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29161300, 28651617, 27741520, 29659569, 33007869, 29884841, 32377563, 36977404, 36329109, 34196900, 35264596) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJul 31, 2024The BRCA2 c.6988A>G (p.Ile2330Val) variant has been reported in the published literature in in individuals with breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMIDs: 35264596 (2022), 36329109 (2022), 34196900 (2021), 33471991 (2021), 28651617 (2017), 27741520 (2016), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/BRCA2)) and prostate cancer (PMID: 29659569 (2018)). This variant has also been identified in reportedly healthy individuals (PMID: 34196900 (2021), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/BRCA2)). This variant has not been reported in large, multi-ethnic general populations (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchGenetics Program, Instituto Nacional de CancerNov 01, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 10, 2024This sequence change replaces isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 2330 of the BRCA2 protein (p.Ile2330Val). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with a personal and/or family history of breast cancer and/or ovarian cancer (PMID: 27741520, 28651617, 29161300, 36329109). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 234463). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA2 protein function with a negative predictive value of 95%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 03, 2020This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMay 25, 2023This missense variant replaces isoleucine with valine at codon 2330 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in individuals with a personal or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer or prostate cancer (PMID: 27741520, 29161300, 29659569, 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_001102, 35264596, 35980532, 36329109, 36977404). This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpSep 28, 2020Variant summary: BRCA2 c.6988A>G (p.Ile2330Val) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 249986 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.6988A>G has been reported in the literature in an HBOC proband with a personal history of breast cancer at age 24 and a family history of breast cancer with no reported co-segregation (Fernandes_2016), as a VUS in another study reporting HBOC probands from Southern Brazil (Alemar_2017), as a VUS specimen previously analyzed at another clinical laboratory (Buzolin_2017), in a study of cancer predisposition panel sequencing in patients with prostate cancer (Paulo_2018). None of these report(s) provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA2 p.Ile2330Val variant was identified in 2 of 1534 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer (Alemar 2017, Fernandes 2016). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs876661032) as "With Uncertain significance allele", ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by GeneDx, Invitae, and Integrated Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America), and LOVD 3.0 (2x). The variant was not identified in the COGR, Cosmic, MutDB, UMD-LSDB, BIC Database, ARUP Laboratories, or Zhejiang University databases. It was not identified in the 1000 Genomes Project, the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project, the Exome Aggregation Consortium (August 8th 2016), or the Genome Aggregation Database (Feb 27, 2017). The p.Ile2330 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.053
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.11
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.40
CADD
Benign
0.043
DANN
Benign
0.23
Eigen
Benign
-1.8
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.7
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0046
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.038
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.031
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.92
T
PrimateAI
Benign
0.26
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.050
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.25
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T
Vest4
0.28
MutPred
0.15
Gain of sheet (P = 0.0827);Gain of sheet (P = 0.0827);
MVP
0.52
MPC
0.021
ClinPred
0.023
T
GERP RS
-5.4
gMVP
0.085

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs876661032; hg19: chr13-32921014; API