13-32362509-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.7806-14T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.526 in 1,608,568 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 223,310 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.54 ( 22039 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.52 ( 201271 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:30O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.41

Publications

70 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
BRCA2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • Fanconi anemia complementation group D1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
  • pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • medulloblastoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.74).
BP6
Variant 13-32362509-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32362509-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 126158.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.561 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkc.7806-14T>C intron_variant Intron 16 of 26 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkc.7806-14T>C intron_variant Intron 16 of 26 5 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3
BRCA2ENST00000530893.7 linkc.7437-14T>C intron_variant Intron 16 of 26 1 ENSP00000499438.2
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkn.7806-6T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 15 of 25 2 ENSP00000506251.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.537
AC:
81547
AN:
151850
Hom.:
22016
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.567
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.427
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.536
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.474
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.572
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.481
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.572
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.430
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.521
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.518
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.523
AC:
130837
AN:
250228
AF XY:
0.520
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.570
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.514
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.471
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.558
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.576
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.517
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.512
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.524
AC:
763705
AN:
1456600
Hom.:
201271
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.523
AC XY:
379264
AN XY:
724988
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.557
AC:
18552
AN:
33312
American (AMR)
AF:
0.514
AC:
22952
AN:
44692
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.476
AC:
12436
AN:
26110
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.608
AC:
24117
AN:
39648
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.489
AC:
42139
AN:
86110
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.574
AC:
30677
AN:
53398
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.409
AC:
2349
AN:
5744
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.523
AC:
579167
AN:
1107380
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.520
AC:
31316
AN:
60206
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.474
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
17231
34462
51692
68923
86154
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
16648
33296
49944
66592
83240
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.537
AC:
81625
AN:
151968
Hom.:
22039
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.540
AC XY:
40088
AN XY:
74292
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.567
AC:
23480
AN:
41422
American (AMR)
AF:
0.536
AC:
8191
AN:
15272
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.474
AC:
1645
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.571
AC:
2960
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.480
AC:
2314
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.572
AC:
6025
AN:
10540
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.432
AC:
127
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.521
AC:
35407
AN:
67948
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.516
AC:
1088
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1904
3808
5711
7615
9519
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
714
1428
2142
2856
3570
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.518
Hom.:
44682
Bravo
AF:
0.533
Asia WGS
AF:
0.526
AC:
1830
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:30Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:9Other:1
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Nov 03, 2014
Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

GreenArray Genomic Research & Solutions of Accurate Diagnostic Private Limited
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 09, 2014
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 12, 2015
Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

Class 1 not pathogenic based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.5507 (Asian), 0.5589 (African), 0.5409 (European), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30).

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 02, 2014
Counsyl
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

High frequency in a 1kG or ESP population: 50.4 %. This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com.

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:9
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 16, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are pr eliminary notes: Frequency

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 01, 2017
GeneKor MSA
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 18, 2017
Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 20, 2017
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Nov 19, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Dec 05, 2014
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 11, 2019
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:3
Apr 19, 2022
National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 29, 2013
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:2
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Nov 27, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Feb 23, 2017
Baylor Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 01, 2025
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Apr 22, 2021
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.74
CADD
Benign
6.5
DANN
Benign
0.81
PhyloP100
-1.4
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs9534262; hg19: chr13-32936646; COSMIC: COSV66447577; API